Quantcast
Channel: Thomas J. Nevin | Tasmanian Photographer
Viewing all 263 articles
Browse latest View live

Prisoner mugshots by Constable John Nevin to 1890

$
0
0
Constable William John Nevin (1851-1891), younger brother of professional photographer Thomas J. Nevin, died suddenly of typhoid fever on 17th June, 1891. The earliest date on record of his service with the police is 1875 when he was stationed at the Cascades Prison for Males, Hobart. His service continued at the Hobart Gaol, Campbell Street, as "Gaol Messenger", a rank which covered his duties as photographer, until his untimely death while still in service, aged 39 yrs old. The registrar of his death gave his age as 43 yrs old; however, his burial records at Cornelian Bay Cemetery on 19th June 1891 listed his death at 39 yrs, i.e. born 1851, and this date is consistent with the Fairlie sick lists shipping records which recorded that he was a babe in arms, less than 6 months old, when he arrived in Hobart on 3rd July 1852 with his settler parents, John and Mary Nevin, and his three older siblings Thomas, Rebecca Jane, and Mary Ann.



Constable John (W. J.) Nevin ca. 1880.
Photo taken by his brother Thomas Nevin
Copyright © KLW NFC & The Nevin Family Collections 2009 ARR. Watermarked.



The Electoral Roll of the Electoral District of North Hobart, year commencing 11th April, 1884:
NEVIN, William John
Place of Abode: H.M. Gaol
Nature of qualification: Salary
Particulars of Qualification: H.M. Government



Archives Office Tasmania
RGD 35/13
Death of John Nevin, Goal Messenger, of Typhoid Fever
17th June 1891

PRISONER IDENTIFICATION PHOTOGRAPHS from 1876-1891
Older brother, commercial photographer Thomas J. Nevin was commissioned by the family solicitor W.R. Giblin, later Attorney-General and Premier from 1872 to 1876 to provide the colonial government of Tasmania with photographs of prisoners while he was still operating from his commercial studios in Elizabeth St and New Town, Hobart. And from 1876 to 1880, when employed in full-time civil service as Office and Hall keeper of the Hobart Town Hall, his photographic services for police continued at the Hobart Gaol with the Municipal Police Office and at the Mayor's Court, housed within the Town Hall. Thomas Nevin was assisted by his younger brother Constable John Nevin at the Hobart Gaol in producing photographic records of prisoners until ca. 1886, his last record (to date) of service to police as assistant bailiff.

During the early to mid-1870s, Thomas Nevin deployed the conventional techniques of 19th century commercial studio vignette portraiture in matters of posing, photographing and printing the final official prisoner identification photograph (mugshot). The prisoner was usually posed with his upper torso turned 45 degrees from the photographer, with sightlines deflected to the edge of the oval vignette, and backgrounded by a plain backcloth. The majority of Nevin’s prisoner photographs taken between 1872-75 evince his use of this commercial technique, for example:



State Library of NSW
James Ogden, photographed by T.J. Nevin 23 September 1875
Call Number DL PX 158



National Library of Australia
John F. Morris, photographed by T.J. Nevin 25th April 1875
nla.pic-an24612762 PIC P1029/36 LOC Album 935

THE FULL FRONTAL GAZE
Most prisoner photographs taken in the 1880s in Tasmania required the subject to face the camera, and in some instances, show the backs of the hands clearly. The full frontal gaze marked the transitional phase between Thomas Nevin's early to mid-1870s commercial vignettes and the 1880s prisoner photographs, taken more often than not at the Hobart Gaol by his brother John Nevin.  No full profile photographs, in addition to the single full frontal shot, were taken until the late 1890s when the methods of Bertillon took hold.



Roland Hill, 23 yrs old, 20th February 1890.
Ref: TAHO GD 6719, p. 148. Gaol Register from the Sheriff's Office Hobart.

Remarkably, this prisoner identification photograph dated 1890 was printed in the commercial oval vignette format, its sole difference from the earlier prisoner vignettes taken by Thomas Nevin being the full frontal gaze of the prisoner. This photograph is not an old one, reprinted from an earlier photograph of the 1870s. It was taken of Roland Hill, 23 years old, a clerk and a first offender, sentenced to two years for larceny, and taken on incarceration at the Hobart Gaol by Constable John Nevin when Roland was transferred from Launceston.



Roland Hill, 23 yrs old, 20th February 1890.
Ref: TAHO GD 6719, detail mugshot from criminal sheet p. 148

OVERLAY PRINTS
Many of the photographs in this register GD 6719 dating to 1890 were reprinted from an earlier photograph of the prisoner, some quite visibly showing the original vignette frame under the second printing within an oblong frame with rounded corners.



This photograph of Charles Dawson was taken by Constable John Nevin on 11 December 1888 at the Hobart Gaol adjacent to the Supreme Court where Dawson was sentenced to 4 years for uttering a forged cheque. The print from the negative was framed initially as an oval vignette, and reprinted within an oblong frame, as an overlay of the vignette, for reasons best known to the printers, whether at the gaol itself in Campbell Street or at the Municipal Police Office, Town Hall in Macquarie Street, or even at the government printing office and registrar in Davey Street. The duties of Constable John Nevin by 1888 was both photographer and gaol messenger. He would have conveyed copies of these prisoner photographs and criminal record sheets back and forth to any of these three authorities.



Charles Dawson, 33 yrs old, 11 December 1888.
Ref: TAHO GD 6719, detail mugshot printed with oblong overlay p. 101

RELATED ARTICLES main weblog

"Lines on the much lamented death of Rebecca Jane Nevin" by John Nevin 1866

$
0
0


John Nevin (1808-1887)
Photo taken by his son Thomas Nevin ca. 1874
Copyright © The Shelverton Collection 2005-2009 Arr.

Thomas Nevin's father, John Nevin (1808-1887) was an accomplished poet. Three poems (to date) have been located in Australian libraries. Although he died peacefully in his garden overlooking the Lady Franklin Museum at Kangaroo Valley, Hobart in 1887, he had already suffered the loss of both daughters - Rebecca Jane in 1865, and Mary Ann in 1879 - as well as his wife, their mother Mary Nevin (1810-1875). He married again in 1879, and died mercifully four years before the death from typhoid fever of his youngest child, William John Nevin (1851-1891). The last remaining child, his eldest and first-born son, photographer Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923), survived them all by decades.



TAHO Ref: NS434/1/155
John Nevin senior (1808-1887), photographed in 1879, aged 71 years, on the occasion of his marriage to his second wife, Martha Genge (aged 46 yrs). Photo © KLW NFC 2012 Arr.

The death of their sister on November 10th, 1865, was a terrible blow to this pioneer family. None could have paid a better tribute than her father in this exquisite poem, written and printed just six weeks after her death.

REBECCA JANE NEVIN (1847-1865)




LINES
On the much lamented Death of
R E B E C C A   J A N E   N E V I N 
Who died at the Wesleyan Chapel, Kangaroo Valley,
On the 10th NOVEMBER, 1865, in the 19th year of her age.

WRITTEN BY HER FATHER

In early childhood's joyous hour,
We brought her from her native soil,
To seek some calm and peaceful bower
Far on Tasmania's sea-girt Isle;
While yet a gentle, fragile thing,
Her infant steps were tottering.

Here, by a mountain streamlet's side,
Its soothing murmurs lov'd to hear,
Or watch its limpid waters glide,
And cull the flow'rs were blooming near;
And tho' her life was mark'd with pain,
Was seldom heard for to complain.

Death early chose her for his prey,
For slow disease with stealthy tread,
Had swept the hues of health away,
And left a sallow cheek instead;
Like some young flow'ret, sickly pale , -
She droop'd and wither'd in the vale.

Full eighteen summer suns have shed,
Refulgent beams on that pale brow,
Ere she was number'd with the dead;
Beyond the reach of anguish now.
The wint'ry blast of death has come,
To lay her in the dark lone tomb.

Cut off in girlhood's hopeful morn,
She pass'd without a murm'ring sigh,
From friends and weeping parents torn,
To higher, fairer worlds on high.
She's gone to join the blood-wash'd throng,
And mingle with the seraphs' song.

The struggle's o'er - loved shade adieu! -
No more shall grief or pain molest;
The wint'ry storms may howl o'er you,
But cannot break thy dreamless rest:
Pluck'd like a rose from parent stem,
To deck a royal diadem.

Her life was guileless as a child,
Nor pride, nor passion ever knew;
A book, a flower - her hour beguiled,
Nor breath'd a heart more kind or true;
No longer kneels with us in prayer: -
Now I behold her vacant chair!

That head in pain shall throb no more,
Nor weary night of restless sleep;
The Jordan pass'd, thy journey's o'er,
And thou shalt never wake to weep;
When the last trumpet loud will sound,
Thou'lt rise triumphant from the ground!

JOHN NEVIN.
Kangaroo Valley,
27th January, 1866.

This is the envelope in which the poem is housed at the University of Melbourne Library, Special Collections. The hand-writing may well be John Nevin's.


CITATIONS
http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/29496131
http://nla.gov.au/anbd.bib-an10001707

The poem is held at the University of Melbourne Library, Special Collections. The original catalogue entry showed an error with regard to the location: i.e. Kangaroo Valley NSW, to be corrected to Kangaroo Valley, Hobart Tasmania (renamed Lenah Valley in 1922), notified 18 July 2013. Assistance from Special Collections gratefully acknowledged.

Contributed by
Libraries Australia
Title
Lines on the much lamented death of Rebecca Jane Nevin : who died at the Wesleyan chapel, Kangaroo Valley, on the 10th November, 1865, in the 19th year of her age /​ John Nevin.
Author
Nevin, John, 19th cent.
Published
Kangaroo Valley [N.S.W.] : [s.n.], 1866.
Physical Description
1 sheet ; 29 x 12 cm.
Language
English
Dewey Number
A821.1
Libraries Australia ID
10001707

APA citation
Nevin, John (1866). Lines on the much lamented death of Rebecca Jane Nevin : who died at the Wesleyan chapel, Kangaroo Valley, on the 10th November, 1865, in the 19th year of her age. [s.n.], Kangaroo Valley [N.S.W.]- (to be amended to Kangaroo Valley, Tasmania.)

TWO MORE POEMS by JOHN NEVIN (1808-1887)



"My Cottage in the Wilderness" by John Nevin, 1868. 
Mitchell Library NSW
Photo © KLW NFC 2009 Arr.



State Library of Tasmania, P820A NEV.

Lines written on the sudden and much lamented death of Mr William Genge who died at the Wesleyan Chapel, Melville-street, Hobart on the morning of 17th January 1881, in the 73rd year of his age” by John Nevin, Kangaroo Valley, January 31st, 1881.

FAMILY PORTRAITS by THOMAS NEVIN



Mary Nevin, mother of Thomas Nevin and siblings, taken early 1870s
From © The Nevin Family and Shelverton Collections 2007-2010 Arr



Mary Ann Nevin (1844-1878), sister of Thomas J. Nevin,
dipping a glass at New Town rivulet, Kangaroo Valley Hobart Tasmania, ca. 1870.
Salt paper stereograph taken by Thomas J. Nevin ca. 1870
Photo © KLW NFC Imprint & The Nevin Family Collections 2012



Family photographs by Thomas Nevin:
Siblings John and Mary Ann Nevin, Thomas Nevin and wife Elizabeth Rachel Day
Photos and originals © The Nevin Family Collections KLW NFC 2010 ARR.



The cottage that John Nevin built at Kangaroo Valley
“T.J. Nevin Photo” inscribed on verso, ca. 1868.
From © The Liam Peters Collection 2010.

RELATED ARTICLES

Two mugshots of convict Hugh Cohen/Cowen/Cowan 1878

$
0
0
These two images of Tasmanian prisoner Hugh Cohen (or Cowan/Cowen) differ slightly in details of his scarf arrangement and shirt collar. The two photographs as captures were taken at different sittings only a short time apart by Thomas J. Nevin, although printed in different formats. The negative and carte-de-visite vignette (on left) was taken and printed by Nevin at the Hobart Gaol on the prisoner's arrival from the Supreme Court Launceston in early April 1878, when Cohen's sentence of death by hanging was passed and was still current. The second negative was taken and printed in the oblong format in late April 1878 when Cohen's death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. There was scarcely a fortnight separating the two photographic captures (see the newspaper reports below). The cdv was held at the central registry for prison documents at the Municipal Police Office, Town Hall, where Nevin was a full-time civil servant, and the oblong framed print was pasted to the prisoner's revised criminal sheet after commutation, held at the Hobart Gaol, per notes appearing on the sheet.



PRISON RECORDS 1878



Detail of criminal register, page 120, GD6719 TAHO.
Hugh Cowan, aged 62 yrs.



TAHO Records:
Sherriff's Office, Hobart Gaol to 1890
Register GD6719, page 120, Hugh Cowen.



Hugh Cowan/Cohen, listed as John Cowen, aged 62 yrs old, arraigned for murder at the Supreme Court Launceston Tasmania beween 4 and 7 April 1878: sentenced to be hanged.
Source: Police Gazette printed as Tasmania Reports of Crime, Information for Police, Gov't Printer, James Barnard.

The carte-de-visite of Hugh Cowan/Cohen/Cowen is held in the David Scott Mitchell Collection in a collection of nine vignettes of Hobart Gaol prisoners taken by T.J. Nevin between 1875 and 1879.

The verso of Cohen's cdv bears a handwritten inscription copied verbatim either from the criminal record sheet or vice versa.

"Hugh Cowen, F. S. Ld Dalhousie, S. Court, Launceston, 4.4.78 Murder -Life"






T. J. Nevin photographs
Prisoners Wallace and Cowen,
SLNSW Mitchell Collection PXB 274
Photos copyright © KLW NFC Imprint 2009-2013 Arr

NEWSPAPER REPORTS

THE DEATH of JOSEPH BARNES
January 2, 1878:



TRANSCRIPT
The Mercury2 January 1878
CAMPBELL TOWN, Tuesday.
On Sunday last, a man named Joseph Barnes was shot dead on the Barton Estate, Macquarie River, by another man named Hugh Cohen. Today an inquest was held on Barnes' remains before Mr Alex Finlay, and a verdict of wilful murder was returned against Cohen who was committed for trial on the coroner's warrant.

INQUEST



At the inquest, Campbell Town
Hugh Cohen tried for murder
Excerpt The Mercury 2 January 1878



Hugh Cohen, judged guilty at inquest
The Mercury 11 January 1878

The whole story, as told by The Launceston Examiner, 5th April 1878

SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL SITTINGS. THURSDAY, April 4.
Before his Honor Sir Francis Smith, Chief Justice.
The Court opened at 11 a.m.
The hon. the Attorney-General,iMr Alfred Dobson, appeared on behalf of the Crown.
WILFUL MURDER.
Hugh Cohen or Cowen, aged 62, was charged with having on thle 30th December last, at Campbell Town, wilfully murdered Joseph Barnes.
The prisoner pleaded not guilty.
The following jury were empannelled : James Lamont (foreman), W. Crabtree, D. Sutherland, W. White, W. Appleby, jun., W. H. Valentine, Thos. Bartlett, G. Coward, W. Atkinson, B. West, J. C. Greig, J. M'Bean. Mr R. B. Miller appeared for the defence.
The Attorney-General briefly stated the circumstances of the case, characterising the deed as one of more than ordinarily premeditated and cold-blooded murder. He then called -
Susan Parkhurst, wife of James Parkhurst, who deposed that she resided on the Barton estate; Joseph Barnes was her step-father; the prisoner lived on the Macquarie River about a mile or mile and a half from their house; on the 29th December prisoner came to her house, and said their bullocks had been in his garden and destroyed it, and he was going to take them away; her husband then came to the door and told prisoner he was very sorry the bullocks had got into his garden; prisoner said he would summons her husband to Campbell Town, and see what he could do with him ; her husband said he must leave them on the run where the garden was, as he wanted to use them in the morning, but he would see what he could do to replace what the bullocks had destroyed; prisoner then went away; on the following day, Dec. 30, prisoner came to their house about 8 a.m. with a gun in his hand; her step father met the prisoner as he was coming up to the door, and said "Good morning, Bluff ;" she went into a backroom where there was a hole in the door through which she looked; prisoner asked if Jim (her husband) was in ; Barnes said he was at Barton ; prisoner said her husband was a daylight robber, the bullocks had destroyed his garden, and robbed him; Barnes said Parkhurst could not help it, for he had no other run to put the bullocks on, and that Mr Fletcher, the manager of the estate, had authorised him to run his bullocks there; prisoner then held up the gun and asked Barnes if he saw it; Barnes said " yes," and prisoner said he would give Parkhurst the contents of it before night ; prisoner then got peaceable and came inside the house; a man named Worthington had been in the kitchen all this time; she then came into the kitchen, and prisoner said "good morning;" he then began stating all he would do to her husband because of the bullocks, and that he would summon Parkhurst ; Barnes said that would be the best thing prisoner could do to stop all rows; prisoner told Barnes to tell Parkhurst to come over to his place at 6 o'clock, and to come himself ; he then went away. Her husband came home shortly afterwards, and she told him what had occurred ; about 10 a.m. prisoner came back; her husband was in the yard ; the yard is not fenced round ; her husband was standing with Barnes near the bullock dray, to which the bullocks were still attached; as prisoner came up Worthington went into the yard from the  kitchen; she was standing at the door ; the prisoner, when about thirty feet from her husband, said "Come here, Jim, I want you". ; her  husband walked over to prisoner, and some conversation ensued between them which she did not hear, but she saw prisoner lift the gun and say "I will blow a hole through you ;" her husband said something and walked back to the bullocks, and drove away with them; Barnes then walked over to prisoner and said - "Now, Paddy, don't you think you ought to be ashamed of yourself, coming where there is a woman with a young family and putting them in bodily fear with fire-arms;" prisoner told him to stand off; Barnes said he would put prisoner and his gun in the river; Barnes had his hands in his pockets at the time ; prisoner again said, "Stand off, or I'll shoot you" and lifted the gun to his shoulder; she screamed and ran back inside the house; she had only taken a couple of steps when she heard the report of the gun, and turned back into the yard; she saw her stepfather falling, and ran and caught hold of him, but the weight of his falling body drew her down on the ground also. At the time prisoner lifted the gun he was not more than six yards distant from Barnes; Worthington had been standing on the woodheap while these matters had been going on; she did not hear him speak to prisoner; her husband came running back on hearing the report, and made at prisoner to get the gun from him; prisoner seized the gun by the barrel and struck at her husband, who stepped back, and the stock struck the ground and split ; Worthington came up with a piece of batten and struck at prisoner. Prisoner had been a neighbor of theirs for nearly four years, and though there had been occasional rows they were on the best of terms. Prisoner was a quiet man when sober ; he was drunk on this day.
Cross-examined by Mr Miller-Prisoner's wife had taken a bottle of brandy from our house on the Sunday morning before 6 o'clock; prisoner's wife had previously asked me to obtain it for her; prisoner was a quiet man when sober, and had never had a quarrel with Barnes; up to the time prisoner threatened to shoot him they had never had an angry word; Barnes was advancing slightly to prisoner at the time ; in spite of the threat Barnes still advanced, and said he would put prisoner and his gun in the river; Barnes was still advancing when prisoner raised the gun. Prisoner had several times during the previous two months complained of the bullocks breaking into his garden, and had about six weeks previously complained of my husband shooting his dog. I and the three men did not attack the prisoner when he came. There was an axe on the place, I believe it was in the bullock-dray.
Samuel Worthington deposed that he was a laborer on the Barton estate, and on the 30th December was staying at the house of James Parkhurst, with whom he was working at the time. He corroborated the statement of the previous witness as to the condition of prisoner when he came to Parkhurst's on the Sunday morning, and the position of the various parties in the yard the second time prisoner came; prisoner asked Parkhurst if he was going to look at his little bit of a garden that Parkhurst's bullocks had upset ; Parkhurst said "No"; Mr Fletcher told me when I unyoked the bullocks to turn them out on the run;" prisoner said, "If you don't come I'll take it out of this," lifting the gun; prisoner then asked Parkhurst to bring Barnes or witness to see what damage the bullocks had done; Parkhurst said " No," and prisoner presented the gun at a him; Parkhurst said he wasn't afraid of prisoner shooting him and, picking up the bullock whip, drove off with the dray; Barnes asked prisoner what he meant by coming there frightening people with a loaded piece ; prisoner said that if Barnes came any nearer he would shoot him too; Barnes said he would throw prisoner and his gun in the river; Barnes was just making a step forward when prisoner shot him dead ; witness seized a piece of batten and rushed towards prisoner who was making a blow at Parkhurst with the butt of the gun, but struck the ground with it; witness struck prisoner wlth the batten, knocking him down; Parkhurst tried to obtain the empty gun from prisoner, and in struggling brought prisoner on his feet, and then wrested the gun from him; prisoner then ran away; witness identified the gun produced as the one prisoner fired; there had been no threatening of prisoner on the part of anyone previously.
Cross-examined by Mr Miller-I have known the prisoner for about four years; he is a quiet and hard working man when sober ; he had never quarrelled with Barnes in his life. I believe if Barnes had not interfered after Parkhurst went away with the dray, the prisoner would have gone away quietly.
The witness was examined at some length by his Honor as to the manner in which Barnes stepped when he said he would throw prisoner in the river, whether in a quiet or threatening manner. The witness said that Barnes still had his hands in his pockets, and had just lifted his foot to step forward quietly, when the prisoner shot him, and as he fell his hands were still in his pockets. Witness imagined from the expression Barnes used that if he had not been shot he would have tried to throw prisoner in the river; the river was only some 30 or 40 yards distant.
James Parkhurst deposed that he was a labourer, living on the Barton Estate; he knew the prisoner as living close by him for four years or more; he had al ways been on very good terms with the prisoner until last Christmas twelve month, when the prisoner came to his place with two guns, and had a few words with his wife; the prisoner complained about the 30th of December that witness had shot his dog, or was cognisant of the fact; witness knew nothing whatever about the dog; prisoner came to him on the Saturday previous to the 30th of December, and asked him to come down to his ground and see what damage the bullocks had done; he went down very early the next morning but prisoner and his wife were asleep; he did not speak to them then ; he had made preparations on the morning of the murder to go away to his work; just as he had got the bullocks yoked and ready to start, he saw prisoner coming up the track towards his place with a gun in his hand; he went forward to meet him'; prisoner said "What's the reason you robbed me, Jim ?" he said "In what shape?" prisoner answered, "By turning your bullocks into my garden;"; he said" That is false"; with that the prisoner flew in a passion and levelled the gun at him; he said, that prisoner was frightened to fire; prisoner stepped back and levelled the gun at witness a second time; he turned round to walk away when his wife sung out, "He is shooting you" ; he turned round and saw prisoner with the gun levelled again; prisoner then lowered the gun and came towards him, who said,. "Keep away until you are sober." Witness then walked away. When he got to the corner of his garden he heard Barnes say, "Paddy, you ought.to be ashamed of yourself coming here with a loaded piece, where there is a family of young children, putting them in bodily fear" ; witness then turned round and saw Barnes take two or three steps in the direction of prisoner, who said, "Stand off, or I"ll blow a hole through you"; with that he pulled the trigger and the gun went off...

Etc etc - the reporter's account was very very long, running over several columns and pages in the Launceston Examiner - with the Judge considering all possible verdicts: murder, homicide, manslaughter, acquittal by reason of insanity - but the jury returned after only twelve minutes' deliberation, with a verdict of "wilful murder". The report ended with this paragraph:

The jury retired at 5.45 p.m. and twelve minutes afterwards returned into Court with a verdict of wilful murder against the prisoner. In answer to the usual question the prisoner said if the Judge was content he was satisfied, but he hoped his Lordship would have mercy upon him. His Honor said there was but one sentence allowed by law, that of death. The prisoner had after a patient trial been found guilty of wilful murder and that sentence imposed upon him the duty of passing sentence of death upon the prisoner. Whether that sentence would be carried out in the extreme limit rested with the Executive Council. He knew no reason why it should not be carried out, and he therefore advised the prisoner not to buoy himself up with any false hopes, but to seek the consolations of a minister of whatever religion he belonged to. The sentence he now pronounced was that the prisoner be taken from the place he stood in to the place whence he came, and from thence to a place of execution, there to be hanged by the neck till he was dead, and may God have mercy on his soul.

Read the full account in the Trove NLA digitised version
Cite: SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL SITTINGS. (1878, April 5). Launceston Examiner (Tas. : 1842 - 1899), p. 2. Retrieved September 11, 2013, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article4778485



TRANSCRIPT
The Mercury April 8th, 1878
SUPREME COURT, LAUNCESTON.
[From our Own Correspondent]
THURSDAY, APRIL 4.
Before His Honor, the Chief Justice.

The additional witnesses in the charge of wilful murder against Hugh Cohen or Cowen, the result of which you have already received by telegram, were James Parkhurst, Melmoth Fletcher, jun., Con- stable Thompson, Sub-Inspector Palmer, and Dr. James Lever. No witnesses were called for the defence, but prisoner's counsel, Mr R. B. Miller, made a long and interesting speech, in which he endeavoured to induce the jury to mitigate their verdict to one of manslaughter only, on the grounds that the prisoner was under the influence of liquor at the time, that owing to an old injury on the head his mental faculties were impaired, and that under the influence of these two things, and the provocation he received from Barnes, the prisoner pulled the trigger in a state of over excitement and fear, and really believed he was acting in self-defence. His Honor summed up very calmly and lucidly, and the jury after an absence of only twelve minutes returned a verdict of guilty of wilful murder. The Judge then passed sentence of death in the usual form holding out no hope of leniency from the Executive, and advising the prisoner not to buoy himself up with false hopes.
The prisoner, who had been very self-possessed during the trial, nodding to various acquaintances in Court, seemed stupefied when the sentence was pronounced.

COMMUTATION



TRANSCRIPT
The Launceston Examiner, 16 April 1878
HOBART TOWN, April 15
The sentence of death passed upon Hugh Cowan, or Cohen, for the murder of Joseph Barnes has been commuted by the Executive to imprisonment for life.

TRANSPORTATION RECORDS 1852
Tasmanian Archives and Heritage Office:

Transported for 7 years as Hugh Cowen, 34 yrs old. A hawker by trade, he was convicted in 1848 at Mayo for uttering base coin, arriving in Hobart in August 1852. His wife and family arrived in 1854 and he was granted a Certificate of Freedom in 1856. Convicted and imprisoned for life at the Hobart Gaol in 1878.

Cowen, Hugh
Convict No: 15411
Extra Identifier:
SEE Surname:
SEE Given Names:
Voyage Ship: Lord Dalhousie
Voyage No: 353
Arrival Date: 14 Aug 1852
Departure Date: 13 Apr 1852
Departure Port: Cork
Conduct Record: CON33/1/109
Muster Roll:
Appropriation List:
Other Records:
Indent: CON14/1/45
Description List: CON18/1/57
Remarks: Application to bring out family GO33/1/80 p983



Conduct Record: CON33/1/109 detail



Conduct Record: CON33/1/109



Description List: CON18/1/57



Indent: CON14/1/45

Tasmanian prisoner portraits from TAHO at Flickr

$
0
0
Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1901-1902)Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)

Tasmanian convict + prison photos, a set by Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office on Flickr.

See the article on this site about the photograph of prisoner Hugh Cohen and another of Cohen by Nevin at the Mitchell Library SLNSW. The majority of mugshots in this collection were taken from the 1890s to the early 1900s. Some show the same prisoner photographed by Nevin in the 1870s but as a much older re-offender, eg. James Geary, originally photographed in 1874 and again in 1889. In addition to this selection of gaol mugshots on prisoner records , the Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office holds over 90 copies and originals of Nevin's prisoner portraits, tagged at the National Library of Australia's Trove service.

Recent 1870s originals uploaded by TAHO (improvements on the black and white copies from the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery) are these, with APA citations:



Alfred Doran, probably Albert Dorman, convict transported per Blenheim. Photograph taken at Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin. LINC Tasmania



George Growsett, convict transported per Lady Montague. Photograph taken at Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin. LINC Tasmania


James Harrison, convict transported per Rodney. Photograph taken at Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin. LINC Tasmania



Henry Smith - but unidentified by TAHO
"Convict, transported per Rodney. Photograph taken at Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin. LINC Tasmania"



James Smith,Convict transported per John Calvin. Photograph taken at Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin. LINC Tasmania



Robert West, convict transported per Gilmore. Photograph taken at Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin. LINC Tasmania



William Ryan, arrived free per City of Hobart, tried Launceston 1868. Photograph taken at Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin. LINC Tasmania


Richard Phillips, convict transported per Atlas. Photograph taken at Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin. LINC Tasmania

RELATED POSTS main weblog



Mugshots removed: William Ford 1886

$
0
0


Above: William Ford, prisoner, booking photographs taken on 27 July 1886 when he was "disposed of by the Supreme Court". On the left, a semi profile photograph without hat, unframed; on the right, torso facing front, gaze deflected down and to left, wearing hat, framed as an oval carte-de-visite. Photographed at the Hobart Gaol by Constable John Nevin, produced by Thomas J. Nevin for the Municipal Police Office, Hobart Town Hall. Both photographs were taken and printed within the conventions of 1870s commercial studio portraiture, typical of Nevin's earlier mugshots of Tasmanian convicts. In 1886 Thomas J. Nevin was working with police in both capacities as photographer and assistant bailiff to Detective Inspector Dorsett, noted in The Mercury, 11 August 1886.

POLICE RECORD 1886


There may have been a different photograph of William Ford which was pasted to this criminal record sheet on incarceration at the Hobart Gaol, Campbell St, sentenced to five years for assault with intent in 1886. The photograph was removed at a date unknown by persons unknown from his criminal record for this offence, as can be seen. An interim criminal record sheet may have existed when William Ford was convicted again for assault with intent on 26 July 1893 within days of discharge, and sentenced to a further six years. On the other hand, the extant two photographs may have been removed in order to be posted on the updated criminal sheet notated with his criminal offences on release in 1897 when he was 29 years old.



William Ford's criminal record sheet dated 27 July 1886
TAHO Ref: GD6719 Page 102

POLICE RECORD 1893





William Ford's criminal record sheet dated 27 November 1897. The last two entries show lengthy sentences of five and six years  in 1886 and 1893.
TAHO Ref: GD12812 Page 292



The printing of carte-de-visite vignettes of prisoner identification photographs in an oval frame was still a common format as late as the 1890s in Tasmania.

Sourced from TAHO at Flickr

The fruitless search of wadsley-1

$
0
0
THE A.H. BOYD PARASITIC ATTRIBUTION:

Is there any solid proof that A. H. Boyd photographed prisoners at Port Arthur? No, there is none. Why should there be, after all, he was not a photographer, just a glorified accountant with a taste for the trimmings of free government supplies and an abusive temper. Just one fragment of an historical document is cited by a diligent National Library of Australia user called wadsley-1 as "proof" (oh, yeah - really?). Here it is:




Letter to the Editor of The Mercury of Friday 20 June, 1873 page 2

TRANSCRIPT
PORT ARTHUR.
TO THE EDITOR OF THE MERCURY.
SIR,-The time has arrived when the Port Arthur question must be settled, and to this end members of the Legislature should be possessed, without delay, of the fullest information on all subjects connected with the internal economy of that isolated prison. Port Arthur has closed doors, secrecy, silence, are engraven on its walls, and little if any thing of its inner workings can be learned by those outside its penal enclosures, except prepared re- ports shewing the economical working and control of Colonial criminals under the present Commandant. Too much reliance, however, should not be placed in these reports, drawn up is they are, under instructions from one whose orders none of his subordinates dare gainsay. Members of Parliament can,however, by a very simple process, obtain a variety of information, not only desirable, but necessary for their guidance at the present juncture.
A tramway is now being erected at Port Arthur, and its praises, as a piece of engineering skill and reproductive work, have been already trumpeted. It would be interesting to know who planned this work, who is its engineer? What good will it effect? What is the opinion of the honorary Director of Public Works, Mr Meredith, or his worthy factotum, Mr Cheverton, on it. Is it under his direction, or is it an experiment of the Commandant, who desires to make for him-self a name not only as an amateur photographer of the day, but as an amateur engineer of the 19th century. What are its gradients? Again, is it not proposed to repair and re-shingle the whole of the buildings, some of which are so leaky that official documents cannot find a dry resting place? Will the walls, except those of the separate prison and one or two other buildings, bear new roofing without being rebuilt? Has the opinion of the Director of Public Works been taken on this matter, and what is it? At this time if such work is progressing when all but interested parties are agreed that Port Arthur should be broken up, the public are entitled to this information, and any member of Parliament can get it for the asking.
The economical working of Port Arthur is a favourite argument with the friends and patrons of the present Commandant ; and the wholesale pur-chase of sheep and cattle is pointed to in proof of his economical qualifications. Would this stand the test of enquiry? How much have the sheep weighed when bought? How much when dead? Have they grown fat or lean on Port Arthur pasturage? Has the scab broken out among the Port Arthur sheep? If so, have the scab inspectors proceeded against then owners? Who is their owner-the Government or the Commandant? Are they beyond the operation of the law? Does the sub-inspector of scab, who purchases stock for the Government, receive any commission for the business in addition to his annual stipend, and if so, how much? Could not the meat be supplied, after deducting all charges connected with purchase and keep of sheep and cattle, at a cheaper rate by con- tract? Why are so many officers constantly leaving Port Arthur? Why are serious offenders appointed to billets which makes punishment for crime a farce? How much does it cost to feed the dogs? These are questions which, if put in Parliament, must be answered, and there are many others of equal importance which the Ministry of the day cannot refuse to answer, without leaving the impression on the public mind that Port Arthur is maintained solely for the benefit of its Commandant, and that the present Ministry are following a course which, when adopted by their predecessors, received their most strenuous opposition.
QUERIST.
This letter to the Editor is cited by someone called "wadsley-1" to justify a massive deception,  to "prove" a lie about the Port Arthur accountant and commandant  A.H. Boyd, who was known and despised as a bully and free-loader in his own lifetime, but never known as a photographer. So why has the National Library of Australia assigned and credited his name to their collection of Tasmanian prisoner mugshots, a collection of 84 photographs originally and correctly attributed to Thomas J. Nevin? Personality politics, no more and no less.

Wadsley-1 is a hard-working toiler in the vineyard of Trove tags: he/she has placed the comment below on every photograph of a Tasmanian convict taken by T.J.  Nevin.  The comment is just about as silly as they can get, though not surprising, given the low levels of education in Tasmania, the impulse to deny, obfuscate, obstruct and resist facts, the unwillingness to let go of the idea that it is convictism which makes Tasmania important, but above all, it is the tenor of the island's imploding interpersonal relationships which places who-you-know above what-you-know that sends people like wadsley-1 into the larger picture with waspish hopes that the world will protect the underdog, laziness, lying and thieving and all.The upper middle bogan thrives in the fishbowl where this paradigm prevails: the species grows fat in History departments with large grants and never mind the trivial outputs.

Wadsley-1 wrote on 16 June 2011:
public:wadsley-1 2011-06-16 11:31:23.0
The Commandant of Port Arthur in 1873, Mr A. H. Boyd was known to be an amateur photographer as was indicated in a letter to the Editor of the Mercury of Friday 20 June, 1873 page 2.
Anonymous wrote on 19  and 20 June 2011:
Anonymous 2011-06-19 13:04:56.0
T.J. Nevin photographed convicts at Port Arthur in 1873 and 1874, at the request of the PA Commandant A.H. Boyd's brother-in-law, Attorney-Gen W.R. Giblin. Plates sent to PA in July 1873 were intended to photograph the ruinous state of the prison site for the Public Works Dept. Boyd did NOT photograph prisoners, nor the site. The commission was awarded to the partnership of Clifford & Nevin.
Anonymous 2011-06-20 00:12:00.0
@wadsley-1: the newspaper item in The Mercury June 20, 1873, is a letter to the editor- it is NOT an official record, and it mocks Boyd being DESIROUS of playing at amateur photographer. It also mocks Boyd's pretensions playing at being an engineer. There is nothing in this newspaper letter to the editor which you cite which in anyway indicates Boyd was a photographer. Being DESIROUS is not the same as being ABLE,, and no mention is made of photographing prisoners by A.H. Boyd. If pretension was a gene, I would venture to suggest you have inherited it.
WHO IS WADSLEY-1?
This person wadsley-1 has placed thousands of tags on newspaper items at the National Library of Australia's Trove digitised newspaper site. Notice the effort put into researching A.H. Boyd in the weighted list at Trove - a total of 208 items for Adolarious Humphrey Boyd.



http://trove.nla.gov.au/userProfile?user=public:wadsley-1

But guess what? Only ONE newspaper item contains the words "photographer", and "A.H. Boyd" in the same breath, and that item is a letter to the Editor by an outraged reader called "Querist" who cannot believe the pretentiousness of A.H. Boyd in claiming a hand in the engineering of the new tramway at Port Arthur, nor the level of corruption Boyd has managed to maintain at the Port Arthur site for his personal comforts. That letter to the editor is the one and only item wadsley-1 has found which mentions Boyd and photographer among 280 newspaper items. How sad is that? All that effort to justify the narcissistic efforts of wadsley-1's "friend", the abusive and deceitful Julia Clark and her meaningless essays - just to hope that A. H. Boyd could be THE photographer of the National Library of Australia's 84 Tasmanian prisoner mugshots, catalogued as Convict portraits Port Arthur, which were originally and correctly attributed to the very real photographer Thomas J. Nevin up to 2007 before Clark imagined she could once again don her crown as the Queen of Misattribution, just to show off to the boys (eg. Chris Long & Warwick Reeder who made the error of attribution, through laziness and credulousness, in the 1990s). But she fell hard on her face, and she will forever be regarded as an aggressive liar and parasite of the information about Thomas J. Nevin she has scraped and abused from these weblogs. Wadsley-1 was Julia Clark's last hope, and how inconvenient that wadsley-1 found NOTHING in five decades of 19th century newspapers to substantiate any claim that A.H. Boyd ever held a camera, let alone had the skills, training, background, or mandate to take a single photograph in any genre, landscape or portrait.

Perhaps wadsley-1 is John Wadsley, paid promoter of Port Arthur. You can ask him. Email Mr Wadsley at wadsley@bigpond.com.

Update October 2013: the tags and comments by wadsley-1 on the TROVE search engine site of the National Library of Australia's holdings of Nevin's Tasmanian convict portraits have finally been removed; however, the attribution to A.H. Boyd on these 84 photographs remains with just ONE justification: a reference to the fantasist lies in the "article" by our blog scraper and personal abuser Julia Clark. No other catalogue entries on the NLA's vast listings of millions of items have been compromised with this sort of revision, the decision taken by the credulous NLA librarian Margy Burn in 2010, whose "reason" for trying to turn this man who was not a photographer  i.e. the despicable A. H. Boyd, into a photographer, is simply because she could. She had the power. The "reason" is all about the use and abuse of power in public institutions by sidewinders for no other reason than to gain personal validation.

Click here to visit TROVE for current lists of biographical news items and photographic works by and about photographer Thomas J. Nevin.

RELATED ARTICLES main weblog

See this article on the PARASITIC ATTRIBUTION to A.H. Boyd and other articles dealing with misattribution issues.


Photographers A. Bock, S. Clifford and T. Nevin at Port Arthur

$
0
0


ALFRED BOCK at PORT ARTHUR 1866
In late March, 1866, photographer Alfred Bock was at the Port Arthur prison site on the Tasman Peninsula, 60 kms south of Hobart at the request of its Commandant, James Boyd. Alfred Bock's studio - The City Photographic Establishment - at 140 Elizabeth Street, Hobart, was manned by his junior partner Thomas Nevin and his apprentice, younger brother William Bock, in his absence. Bock's mission at Port Arthur was to provide a series of landscapes and portraits of officials. However, it was photographer Samuel Clifford, Nevin's friend and mentor, of Liverpool Street, Hobart, who was the source and supplier of photographic materials to the Port Arthur prison administration, in this instance for Alfred Bock in March 1866, and again in August 1873, when Clifford himself visited the prison site.

Alfred Bock sent Samuel Clifford an urgent telegram from Port Arthur on 27th March 1866 requesting 24 dry plates - panoramic. The details of the telegram were recorded as -

March 1866 Account of Private Telegrams
Date 27th March, No. 269, Alfred Bock to Mr Clifford Liverpool St. H. Town,
"Send down 24 dry Plates Panoramic. by the Shannon,  at once. - Reply."



Source:
Tasmanian Papers 316 (microfilm) 
Records of Telegrams sent and received between Hobart and Port Arthur 1863-1871
Mitchell Library, State Library NSW
Photos © KLW NFC Imprint 2013

Alfred Bock's portraits of Commandant James Boyd were reported in the Mercury on 10th October 1866:



From Bock's telegram, it is very clear that dry plate photography was practiced by both Alfred Bock and his assistants, and by Samuel Clifford, as early as 1866. At left is an example of Alfred Bock's solar-enlarged photography which he may have devised from technical instructions published in The Photographic News, 1863. Both photographs are held at the State Library of Tasmania:

Notes for painted photograph of James Boyd on left:
Title: Mr. James Boyd
Creator(s): Bock, Alfred, 1835-1920
Date: 1866
Description: 1 photograph : sepia ; 15 x 10 cm.
Notes: Exact measurements : 144 x 100 mm, Title inscribed in ink on card mount centred below image., "Mercury 10/8/66, Portrait by Mr. Alfred Bock, presented to Jas. Boyd, 2/8/66" inscribed in pencil on verso., Original created by Alfred Bock., Photograph of an oil painting, painted over solar-enlarged photograph, head and shoulders inclined to left.
Subjects: Boyd, James - fl. 1866
Location: Allport Library and Museum of Fine Arts
ADRI: AUTAS001125882142

Notes for photograph of James Boyd and his horse:
Title: James Boyd, Commandant P. Arthur
Creator(s): Bock, Alfred, 1835-1920
Date: 186-?
Description: 1 photograph : sepia ; 10 x 6 cm.
Notes: Exact measurements : 93 x 58 mm, Title inscribed in pencil on verso in unknown hand., Full length photograph of James Boyd standing beside his horse.
Location: Allport Library and Museum of Fine Arts
ADRI: AUTAS001125882134

This photograph of the Port Arthur officials' cricket team, also attributed to Bock, was probably taken in March 1866.



State Library of Tasmania
Title: Officers at Port Arthur Cricket Team
Creator(s):Bock, Alfred, 1835-1920
Date: Between 1858 and 1867
Description: 1 photograph mounted on board : sepia toned ; 7 x 10 cm.
Notes: Exact measurements of image: 58 x 95 mm., Title derived from note inscribed in pencil on verso by unknown hand., Alfred Bock's trademark for his studio at 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart on verso.
Location: Allport Library and Museum of Fine Arts
ADRI: AUTAS001126187517

See also these articles (main weblog):


James Boyd, Port Arthur Commandant ca. 1860s.
Source: Australia: Image of a Nation 1850-1950 by David Moore and Rodney Hall (Collins 1983).

SAMUEL CLIFFORD at PORT ARTHUR 1873
The way bill for the government schooner Harriet of July 24th, 1873, recorded that a cargo of 2 gross (288) photographic glass plates were intended for Port Arthur. Photographer Samuel Clifford had supplied the plates in anticipation of photographing the Colonial Governor Du Cane and his party of vice-regal visitors from South Australia. Because of a major dispute between the incumbent Port Arthur commandant A. H. Boyd with the Lands and Survey Department's photographer and painter William Piguenit, who subsequently resigned in protest at Boyd's bullying, the commission to photograph the ruinous state of the Port Arthur prison site at the request of opponents within the Colonial government was assigned to Samuel Clifford and Thomas Nevin. Opponents to the continuation of extravagant expenditure urged Parliament in July 1873 to close down the prison, transfer the prisoners to the gaol in Hobart, and dismiss the much despised Port Arthur commandant, Adolarious Humphrey Boyd, on grounds of corruption. As a result, from July 1873, those sixty or so prisoners still at Port Arthur were relocated to the gaol in Hobart (Campbell St) where they were photographed by Thomas Nevin on arrival, and A. H. Boyd was effectively removed from Port Arthur to a position in charge of paupers at the Cascades Prison for Males in Hobart by February 1874, per this notice in the Mercury, 19 January 1874:

boydpacoverdale19jan1874

TRANSCRIPT
PORT ARTHUR.-The breaking up of Port Arthur is proceeding more rapidly than the public have any idea of. The transference of prisoners to Hobart Town has been completed so far as is considered advisable till further accommodation can be pro-vided in Hobart Town, and sufficiently far to allow of Mr. Boyd's early transference from Port Arthur. Dr. Coverdale proceeds to Port Arthur at once, and takes medical charge, vice Dr. McCarthy resigned. He will be initiated into the duties of Superintendent by Mr. Boyd till 31st March, when he will assume duties as the head of the establishment, and when Mr. Boyd will be transferred to the Cascades, which, we learn, can be fitted up at a very moderate ex-pense to be a place of safe-keeping for criminals. (Mercury, 19 January 1874).
Boyd was neither a photographer, nor an engineer, and the row ensuing over Piguenit resonated throughout the dying days of his tenure at Port Arthur, both within Government and in the press.



Way bill for the Harriet, 20 July 1873:
288 photographic glasses as cargo to Port Arthur
Source: Tasmanian Papers 320 (microfilm)
Mitchell Library, State Library NSW
Photos © KLW NFC Imprint 2013


Samuel Clifford arrived at Port Arthur on board the Harriet on August 12th, 1873, together with a case of photographic materials. He fulfilled the commission, and departed Port Arthur on board the Harriet on 28 August 1873.



Way bill
Samuel Clifford (passenger list, top of second page) arrives at Port Arthur with photographic materials on August 12, 1873.




Way bill
Samuel Clifford (passenger list) departs Port Arthur on 22 August 1873.
Source:
Tasmanian Papers 320 (microfilm)
Mitchell Library, State Library NSW
Photos © KLW NFC Imprint 2013

Several photos taken by Samuel Clifford at Port Arthur were forwarded to the monthly magazine The Australasian Sketcher, which were published as engravings in August 1873, and mentioned again in the October 1873 issue:



"The photographs from which our views are engraved, as also those of Port Arthur, given in our last issue, were taken by Mr Clifford of Hobart Town." The Australasian Sketcher 4 October 1873.

cliffordpa1873austsketcher

The Australasian Sketcher with Pen and Pencil was a monthly magazine published by the proprietors of The Argus between 1873 and 1889 and contained many illustrations, engravings, and articles which captured "the picturesque phases of our public and social life of notable objects and events in Australia and New Zealand". It provides an important pictorial account of life in the colonies before the wide spread use of photography.(Notes from NLA Trove).



State Library of Tasmania
Stereo by Samuel Clifford, print by T. Nevin
Ref:AUTAS001124851726



State Library of Tasmania
Stereo print of Port Arthur by Thomas Nevin
Ref: 17AUTAS001124851759 (color corrected for display here)



Samuel Clifford's series 1873
The Government Cottage, Port Arthur,
Photo dated 1873
State Library of Tasmania



Samuel Clifford, Port Arthur panoramic No, 2
State Library Tasmania
Ref:17AUTAS001124075847

See also these articles (main weblog):

THOMAS NEVIN at PORT ARTHUR 1874
Thomas Nevin had worked closely with Alfred Bock and Samuel Clifford from the mid 1860s to the mid 1870s. From Bock he learnt portraiture until Bock's departure from Tasmania in 1867, and from Clifford he learnt stereography. Although some of Nevin's townscapes survive in public collections (TMAG, TAHO, QVMAG), it is his studio portraiture of both private clients and prisoners which is his enduring legacy. Of the hundreds of extant prisoner mugshots in public collections taken by Nevin, two photographs of prisoners, taken in 1875 rate a mention here because the prisoners are wearing prison hats made at Port Arthur. The way bill for the government schooner Harriet for the 4th July 1873 listed a cargo of 2000 leather caps sent to Hobart.



Way bill for the Harriet 4th July 1873 from Port Arthur to Hobart
2000 leather caps, 1800 woollen ditto.
Source:
Tasmanian Papers 320 (microfilm)
Mitchell Library, State Library NSW
Photos © KLW NFC Imprint 2013



These photographs are the only two in public collections of Tasmanian convicts wearing the leather caps. Nevin's photographs give an accurate idea of the styling of the leather caps, what were made of, when they were worn, who wore them, and how they were worn. A falsified and misleading description by Julia Clark of these two photographs by Nevin, which we originally photographed at the Mitchell Library for this weblog in 2009, has appeared in an article titled  More than Magpies: Tasmanian Convict Clothing in Public Collections, Linda Clark, Julia Clark, Elspeth Wishart, Kim Simpson and Ian Terry, Historic Environment Volume 24 Number 3 2012, without acknowledgement to either Nevin or the source of their information, namely these weblogs. They falsify the dates - 1880s instead of 1875, and in the footnote give a date of 1800 (!) for the photographs, minus the attribution to Nevin. These museum workers are reprehensible propogandists forKim Simpson's ancestor, A. H. Boyd, who wishes Boyd might have taken the NLA's collection of photos of Tasmanian prisoners or "Port Arthur convicts 1874", though Julia Clark et al have known all along only too well that it never happened, and never could have possibly happened. In addition to the plagiarisation of our material about these caps, the same authors have used information only found on these Nevin weblogs about the painted-on scarf on Bramall's mugshot by Nevin, revealed only through our colour-correction (see below).





The two photographs of prisoners, James Mullins on left and William Smith on right, were taken in 1875 at the Hobart Gaol. Both wearing leather caps. Verso bears Nevin's stamp with Hobart Supreme Court Royal Arms insignia.
Photos © KLW NFC Imprint 2013
Mitchell Library SLNSW (PXB 274)

Neither carte bears a date, but the photographs can be dated from the same week of 9th July 1875 when both men were booked and sentenced at the Hobart Supreme Court . Mullins' carte (on left) is numbered recto "198" and Smith's (on right) is numbered recto "200". Nevin took an earlier and different photograph of an unshaven Smith, which is numbered "199" and stamped verso as well. It is held at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery. See this article here on this site. A journalist visiting the Hobart Gaol in 1882 noted this uniform with the cap in his report to the The Mercury on 8th July 1882:

In their dark-grey uniform and black leathern caps, with their criminal visages, shaven of the covering Nature had given to aid them in the concealment of their vicious propensities and villainous characters, they were, in truth, a forbidding, repulsive lot. Yet very far from unintelligent, at least, in some marked instances. A villainous shrewdness and a perverse cleverness writ in many a cunning, gleamy eye and heavy brow ; and a dogged determination to be read in the set of the jaw, and the style of the gait, were as the translated speech of artfully calculated, daring crime.



William Smith per Gilmore 3.
Photo by Thomas Nevin, July 1875; copyright KLW NFC 2009 ARR
Stamped verso with Nevin's government stamp
Mitchell Library NSW PXB 274 No.1

On May 8th, 1874, Thomas Nevin journeyed to Port Arthur on board the Harriet, in the company of a prisoner whom he had earlier photographed as William Campbell, but who was subsequently hanged as Job Smith. The new Surgeon-Commandant of the prison site, Dr Coverdale, by that date was implementing a speedy evacuation of all prisoners to the Hobart Gaol. Nevin photographed some of these serious offenders in situ at Port Arthur, but the majority he photographed when they were received in Hobart.



Mr Nevin arrives at Port Arthur aboard the Harriet, May 8th, 1874
accompanying the prisoner whom he had photographed as William Campbell
but who was hanged as Job Smith at the Hobart Gaol, May 1875.
Source: Mitchell Library SLNSW, Tasmanian Papers Ref: 320.



William Campbell returned to the Hobart Gaol four days later in the company of Constable Mooney on board the Harriet , 12 May 1874. He carried no luggage. Nevin remained at Port Arthur for another week, returning to Hobart with his father-in-law, master mariner Captain James Day, on board the Star.



Photo by Thomas J. Nevin of prisoner William Campbell, hanged as Job Smith. Color-corrected to reveal Nevin's studio assistant's hand-tinting of the prison issue scarf .
National Library of Australia Collection
nla.pic-vn4270353
William Campbell, per S. [Sir] R. [Robert] Peel, taken at Port Arthur, 1874 [picture] 1874.
1 photograph on carte-de-visite mount : albumen, hand col. ; 9.4 x 5.6 cm., on mount 10.4 x 6.4 cm.

Bramall aka Taylor or Johnston hand colored

The original cdvs of Job Smith and Bramall online at the National Library of Australia (below) do not show the hand-tinting, yet Clark et al have referenced both cdvs with comments about the colouring without acknowledgement of their source, namely our weblogs or Nevin as the photographer. We colour-corrected this photograph of Bramall to reveal that the prison scarf was painted onto the neck of this prisoner, detailed in this weblog post of December 2009.

In the carte of Walter Johnson aka Bramall aka Taylor (sic, below), however, there IS no neckerchief. He is not wearing one at all underneath his collar, so the blueish colouring we can see is actually just paint patterned in squares to look like the standard issue neckerchief. This is a telling detail, and would have been added by Nevin to the print he made of an earlier photograph he took of Bramall to underscore the fact that the man was in effect a prisoner who had absconded in prison clothing. The eyes of this man have intense blue colouring as well. The reason for the colour was not to render a pretty picture; it was to aid the public's recognition of him. The carte would have been displayed at the Town Hall Police Office, and most likely exhibited in Nevin's studio window at 140 Elizabeth St, Hobart Town. It would have been available to the public, on sale, since Johnstone alias Bramall alias Taylor absconded from the Cascades area of Hobart on June 6th, 1874, and appears to have succeeded in remaining at large, as his recapture was not recorded during 1875.

jobbrammallscarfnla
MICROFILM IMAGES:



Sources:
Tasmanian Papers 316, 317, 320  (microfilm) 
Mitchell Library, State Library NSW
ALL photos © KLW NFC Imprint 2013

RELATED POSTS main weblog

Captain Edward Goldsmith and the Waterloo (1832)

$
0
0



Captain Edward Goldsmith (1804-1869) ca. 1849
Uncle of Elizabeth Rachel Nevin nee Day, photographer Thomas Nevin's wife.
Daguerreotype © Private Collection KLW NFC Imprint 2014

The WATERLOO 1832
Despite the trials and calamities which beset his very first command as a young master of the Jameson the voyage to the Swan River, Western Australia, in 1830, Captain Edward Goldsmith returned to London on board the Norval via Hobart and Sydney (dep. 26 April 1831) to command another ship bound for the port of Hobart, the Waterloo (not to be confused with the convict transport the Waterloo which was shipwrecked at Cape Town in 1842).

The 266 tons brig Waterloo built at Hull carried no guns, and was manned by 13 crew when they left Liverpool on 28 March. They arrived at the port of Hobart on August 5th carrying a general cargo, 28 adults, including pensioners, some bound for NSW, and 8 children. One man died during the voyage.



Hobart Port Officer's Report of the arrival of the Waterloo, 5 August 1832
Source: TAHO Arrivals MB2/39/1/1 P276
Goldsmith Ship's Master Waterloo 5 Aug 1832 MB2/39/1/1 P276



Source: The Waterloo, master Edward Goldsmith, arrived Sydney 20 August 1832
New South Wales Australia Unassisted Immigrant Passenger Lists 1826-1922

After a short stay of ten days in Hobart, Captain Goldsmith set sail for Port Jackson (Sydney) on 16th August, 1832, arriving on 20th August. He reported no instances of cholera or other infectious diseases, and no Surgeon aboard. Exactly one year later, Captain Goldsmith arrived again in Hobart as master of the Wave, a ship he commanded on several more voyages between 1833 and 1839 . He attended the wedding of his wife's brother, master mariner Captain James Day to Rachel Pocock - parents of photographer Thomas Nevin's wife Elizabeth Rachel Day (b. 1847, Rotherhithe) - at St David's in 1841, and returned every year thereafter to Hobart in command of various brigs and barques, including his finest, the Rattler, which he advertised in superlatives, but he never again commanded the Waterloo. His last voyage and final farewell to Hobart was in December 1855 when he returned home to Gadshill, Higham, Kent.



Signature of Edward Goldsmith, witness, on marriage certificate at -
St David's Hobarton
6th January 1841
James Day, 34yrs, Master Mariner
Rachel Pocock, 29 years, Spinster

SUMMARY (incomplete list) of Captain Edward GOLDSMITH's voyages to and from Hobart 1830-1849:

1830
Departed Goldsmith Child Passenger on the Elizabeth 15 Aug 1830 Hobart to Port Jackson
Ship to colony Bombay Child of Captain and Mrs CUS33/1/1 p258
Departed Goldsmith Mrs Passenger on the Elizabeth 15 Aug 1830 Hobart to Port Jackson
Ship to colony Bombay CUS33/1/1 p258
Departed Goldsmith Captain Passenger on the Bombay 22 Aug 1830 Hobart to Sydney CUS33/1/1 p253

1832
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Ship's Master on the Waterloo 5 Aug 1832 MB2/39/1/1 P276
Departed Hobart Goldsmith E Master Waterloo 15 Aug 1832 Hobart to Sydney CUS33/1/1 p474

1833
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Ship's Master on the Wave 14 Nov 1833 MB2/39/1/1 P443

1835
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Ship's Master on the Wave 9 Mar 1835 MB2/39/1/2 P245

1836
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Ship's Master Wave 6 Dec 1836 MB2/39/1/3 P73

1838
Arrived in Hobart from Portsmouth on the barque The Wave 17 July 1838
Goldsmith Ship's Master Wave 17 July 1838 MB2/39/1/4 P100

1839
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Ship's Master on the Wave 25 Sep 1839 MB2/39/1/4 P351

1842
Arrived in Hobart from London, Goldsmith Ship's Master on the Janet Izzatt 26 Oct 1842 MB2/39/1/6 P355

1843
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Ship's Master on the Janet Izzatt 16 Dec 1843 MB2/39/1/7 P313

1844
Arrived Goldsmith Capt on the Louisa 13 Dec 1844 CSO92/1/13 P110

1845
Arrived in Sydney from Hobart Town on the Louisa, 1st January 1845
Arrived in Sydney from London and Cape of Good Hope, Goldsmith Cpt master of the Angelina, 12 December 1845



1846
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Mr Rattler 11 Nov 1846 CSO92/1/16 P96
Goldsmith Ship's Master Rattler 12 Nov 1846 MB2/39/1/9 P45

1847
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Ship's Master on the Rattler 11 Nov 1847 MB2/39/1/9 P374

1848
Arrived in Hobart Goldsmith Ship's Master on the Rattler 5 Dec 1848 MB2/39/1/10 P374

1849
Arrived in Hobart from London on the Rattler, 27 November 1849 Goldsmith Ship's Master
Rattler 27 Nov 1849 MB2/39/1/11 P381
Arrived Goldsmith Mrs on the Rattler from London 27 Nov 1849 MB2/39/1/11 P381

THE WATERLOO 1842
Although this convict transport bears the same name as the Waterloo which arrived safely at Hobart Town in 1832 under the command of Captain Edward Goldsmith, it appears NOT to be the same vessel. This vessel was shipwrecked off Cape Town in 1842, it weighed 414 tons, not 266 tons, and was built at Bristol, not Hull, in 1815, though it too was built for the timber trade, and in a state of “fragility and rottenness” -

" ... no longer fit to carry logs, she is patched up like other whited sepulchres, stuffed with a living cargo by a contractor, and dispatched to the ends of the earth – a voyage of more than twenty thousand miles ..." (see the editorial below)



Source: State library Tasmania
Wreck of the Waterloo
Charles Hutchins, lithographer, from a sketch by Captn. Hext, 4th The King's Own regiment

The South African Commercial Advertiser for 31 August 1842 and for 3, 7 and 10 September 1842 carried reports of the wreck of the convict ship Waterloo in a scathing critique of those responsible. . Sue MacKay has posted this transcript online together with names of those who died and those who survived.

Editorial 31 August 1842
Cape Town, August 31 1842
On the forenoon of Sunday last two large vessels, the Abercrombie Robinson and the Waterloo went on shore on the South Eastern beach at the bottom of Table Bay.
Both vessels were engaged as Transports by the British Government. The Abercrombie Robinson had on board, besides her crew and several passengers, 501 soldiers with their officers. She was a large Ship of nearly 1500 tons burden. After grounding near the shore she stood upright, and no lives have been lost. She will probably, or rather certainly, be a total wreck.
The Waterloo, a Ship of 414 tons, bound to Van Diemen’s Land, had on board, besides her crew, two hundred and nineteen male convicts, Dr. HELSELL in charge, Lt. HEXT, Ensign LEIGH, thirty men of HM 99th Regiment, five women and thirteen children. She took the ground between eleven and twelve o’clock in the forenoon and in fifteen or twenty minutes became a mass of rubbish, And now ensued a most piteous massacre. In about two hours and a half, amidst the crumbling heaps of their perfidious prison – of men, women and children, one hundred and ninety four were crushed, disabled and drowned.
There was no preparation for saving life made on board or on shore. No life buoys, no coils of ropes lashed to casks, nor any apparatus for establishing a communication with the shore from the Ship.
On the shore there was no Life Boat, no apparatus for throwing ropes over stranded vessels, nor any thing, in short, to show that the Government or people here had ever before heard of such a thing as a shipwreck. We stood amongst thousands on the beach within a hundred and fifty yards of the dissolving fabric, looking on the agonised faces of our fellow creatures, as they sunk in dozens, battered and bruised and suffocated – useless as children, or idiots, or wild Caffers. As corpse after corpse floated to our feet, and was raised from the brine, there seemed a curse in every dead man’s eye on the improvidence, the imbecility, the brutish indifference to human suffering and human life, to which, combined with fiendish avarice, so many miserable souls had been sacrificed.
For this ship, it appears, was built twenty seven years ago at Bristol, of light materials for the timber trade. No longer fit to carry logs, she is patched up like other whited sepulchres, stuffed with a living cargo by a contractor, and dispatched to the ends of the earth – a voyage of more than twenty thousand miles.
No doubt a “survey of professional men” will “find” that there was no fault anywhere; that the Waterloo was a sound ship, thoroughly repaired, and perfectly seaworthy; that she had on board all the equipments requisite for such a voyage and such a consignment; that the officers of the ship did all that human strength, directed by skill and animated by humanity, could do; and that the accident must be ascribed entirely to a hurricane, a mountainous sea, and a remarkably hard beach.
Now as to the hurricane and the mountainous sea, it is enough to observe that there were twenty other vessels at anchor in the Bay, besides the Waterloo and the Abercrombie Robinson, and none of them parted from their anchors, or dragged them to any perceptible extent. The wind was blowing a gale, but by no means a violent one, and it was partly off shore. The sea was not running unusually high. Without ropes in their hands or any precaution, men walked into the water up to their shoulders to drag out the bodies of the dead and dying, without the slightest risk. This could not have been done had the surf been such as a gale causes on an open beach. These are facts to which thousands can bear witness.
With respect to the bottom or ground where the ship struck, some say it is rock, others that it is sand, like the rest of the beach. As soon as the weather is fine it will be examined, and the most convenient spaces marked for this method of disembarking Her Majesty’s troops or convicts.
For some years back such “accidents” have been ascribed to the insufficiency of Lighthouses at the entrance of the Bay. That fault has just been fully remedied. The old Lighthouse is now properly attended, and the new one is so well placed, and so brilliant, that no man dare pretend to miss it, or to mistake it for anything else. These and some further improvements in this department, still in progress, were forced on the Government by the remonstrances of the Public, and particularly of the mercantile body.
When the Helen was lost at the entrance of the Bay, four or five months ago, the Commercial Committee very properly inquired into the cause, and found on the testimony of numerous witnesses that the Lights on that particular night were defective, and had thus misled the master of the vessel. This they represented to Government, and a remedy was instantly found.
We recommend the same course in the present case. The committee cannot compel witnesses to attend or give evidence, but they can invite them; and if interested parties disregard such invitations, that fact will not be without meaning.
These two wrecks will be much talked of at home. We think we can insure their being mentioned in Parliament. Let us show that we here are neither indifferent to human life nor to the character of our bay, which the villainy and the incapacity of strangers have too often brought into undeserved disrepute.
In the midst of this unhesitating condemnation on some points, and charges of guilt on others, we have to mention that two unofficial spectators, Mr. MOLTENE and Mr. STILL, procured the assistance of a common boat belonging to a Malay, which reached the Waterloo after she was falling to pieces, and brought off two men, and on a second trip fastened a rope to the wreck. After this a larger boat, belonging to Messrs. SINCLAIR was brought from the Abercrombie Robinson, and moving backwards and forwards along the rope, saved a good many lives. This shows what might have been done by a Life Boat used in time.
We purposely avoid going further into details at present, satisfied with thus openly charging all the parties concerned, before the world, with the offence of culpable negligence, or criminal intention. The world, let them be well assured, expects an answer, and will treat them according to the case they may make out in defence.
It is not strange, by the way, that we should hear such lamentations from what is called the Shipping Interest, as if no employment could be had for their new-built, fine-moulded, copper-fastened A.I. Vessels, while for the most important of all services, the transport namely of troops, and of persons under Judicial Sentences, such vessels as the Waterloo find ready acceptance in the twenty seventh year of their fragility and rottenness? We shall endeavour to force our way through this moral confusion, convinced that either the Shipping Interest are a pack of liars or the Contractors a pack of knaves. The official gentry who grant the contracts and their cousins the Surveyors will naturally fall into their proper places in the course of the Inquiry.



Records of the convicts aboard the Waterloo who drowned.
Source: TAHO
Item CON33/1/30 Cape Packet ex Waterloo (2) 01 Nov 1842 24 Nov 1842
Item CON14/1/18 Cape Packet ex Waterloo 24 Nov 1842 24 Nov 1842 24 Nov 1842


Copy, dated 24 November 1842, of alphabetical list of convicts saved from the wreck of the Waterloo, convict ship; forwarded to the Lieut. Gov. of Van Diemens Land from the Government of the Cape of Good Hope.



Painting of the troop carrier "Abercrombie Robinson" and the convict ship "Waterloo", aground in Table Bay in August 1842. Unattributed, sourced at Wikipedia.

RELATED POSTS main weblog


    Captain Edward Goldsmith at The New Market Banquet 1854

    $
    0
    0
    By 1854, master mariner Captain Edward Goldsmith had enriched the colony of Tasmania for more than twenty years through his annual voyages in command of merchant ships bringing immigrants, agricultural produce, ship and engineering equipment and fashionable merchandise from Europe and the Americas. He had benefited the colony through the export of Tasmanian horticulture and timbers, especially the blue gum which he exhibited at the Paris Expo in 1855. He constructed the first patent slip on the Domain, and he had bought land in the northern suburbs of Hobart. He witnessed his brother-in-law's marriage, master mariner Captain James Day (photographer Thomas Nevin's future father-in-law) in Hobart in 1841, and was present too when his eldest son Richard died in Hobart in 1854. Captain Edward Goldsmith was highly esteemed by both the Hobart City Corporation's Mayor and aldermen and the business community. He attended the Regattas as a judge, and at his testimonial dinner in 1849 at the Hobart Town Hall, he stated that he might become a colonist and settle in Hobart, but that was not to be. He attended many social functions sponsored by the Governor and Mayor before his final departure in 1855, sometimes with his younger son Edward Goldsmith jnr, who accompanied him to the Governor's Levee. The construction of the New Market on the Hobart Wharves, and the banquet held to celebrate its opening in January 1854, was another of his interests and an event he attended in the company of Hobart's most illustrious officers and the colony's most modest traders alike.

    ADVERTISEMENT for the NEW MARKET BANQUET
    The Hobart Courier, 19 January 1854

    PUBLIC BANQUET
    TO CELEBRATE THE
    OPENING of the NEW MARKET.
    THE COMMITTEE for making the requisite Arrangements beg to acquaint the public that the Banquet will take place at the New Market, Macquarie-street, on FRIDAY, the 20th instant, at half past 6 for 7 o'clock precisely. The Worshipful the Mayor of Hobarton will preside on the occasion, anti the Committee have been honoured by his Excellency the Lieutenant Governor's acceptance of their invitation. The Hon. the Speaker and the Members of the Executive and Legislative Councils, the Commander of the Forces, the Corporation of Hobarton, the Officers of the Garrison, and other guests will be invited to attend; and the Committee rely upon the inhabitants of the island to support them in an entertainment which must lend to the establishment of that good-will and co-operation which is so necessary for the prosperity of the colony.
    Tickets-price 30s- each-may be obtained until the 13th instant, after which none will be issued, of Mr. W. Coote, Macquarie-street, Mr. C. Toby, Old Wharf,
    Mr. F. G. Holbird, Elizabeth-street, Mr. F. Lipscombe, Murray-street,
    Mr. J.T. Coram, City Market Office,
    And of Messrs. Huxtable & Co., Murray-street, Messrs. Walch, Elizabeth-street, Hobart Town ; and Mr. A. Duthie, Launceston.
    Applications from country residents may be made to the Secretary.
    91 J. T. CORAM, City Market Office.

    Source: Classified Advertising. (1854, January 19).The Courier(Hobart, Tas. : 1840 - 1859), p. 1. Retrieved January 3, 2014, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article224379



    The New Market 1865 (color-corrected for display here)
    Stereograph by Samuel Clifford (Nevin's partner, friend and mentor)

    TAHO Catalogue Notes
    Title: New Market, Macquarie St
    Publisher: ca. 1865
    Description: 1 stereoscopic pair of photographs : sepia toned ; 8 x 8 cm. each, on mount 9 x 18 cm
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: AUTAS001124851460
    Source: W.L. Crowther Library
    Series: Views in Tasmania
    Notes: On verso: title inscribed in ink on centre of label ; printed above title: Views in Tasmania ; printed below title: S. Clifford, photographer, Hobart Town
    Date and accession number in pencil upper right corner of verso
    Exact size 74 x 73 mm. each, on mount 84 x 174 mm


    The following account of the banquet, printed in the Hobart Courier, 24 January 1854, is without doubt a remarkably detailed piece of journalism in which the reporter revels in every detail, every outburst of laughter, and every joke. It's well worth a read.

    READ the full account (pdf) here.

    TRANSCRIPT
    NEW MARKET BANQUET.
    HAVING in our last, given a notice of the entertainment, on occasion of opening the New Market, on Friday evening, we proceed according to promise, to furnish a more full report. The time fixed for the Dinner being half-past six for seven o'clock, His Excellency the Lieut.-Governor arrived at about five minutes before seven, being received by a guard of honor, at the southern entrance of the market. His Worship the Mayor of Hobart Town, conducted His Excellency to the Dinner Hall, the hon. Colonel Despard commander of the forces,' and M.E C, the Colonial Secretary and Colonial Treasurer, Lieut. Colonel Last, (Private Secretary) Lieut. Colonel Ainsworth, Lieutenant Lochner, (Aide-de-Camp) Mr. Coote, (Chairman of the Banquet Committee) 'ace., attending him; His Excellency being loudly cheered on arrival at the building, and during his progress along the dining hall. The city Aldermen, the members of Council, the remainder of the officers of ihe garrison, and the other guests, then took their places at the tables, cards being arranged on the plates, to indicate their appropriate seats...



    ... At the centre table, and immediately near the upper table, we observed the honorable members for Oatlands, Brighton, and Campbell Town, together with Captain Langdon, Mr. Bisdee, Mr. Hone, Lieut.-Col. Jackson, D. C. G. Bishop ; Aldermen Elliston, Bonney, Worley, and Thomson. The Revs. Dr. Lillie, Buckland. Messrs. W. Robertson, Roope, Harris, Roberts, J.C.Walker, Capt. Goldsmith, Dr. Huxtable. Mr. Frederick Lipscombe as representative of the Market interest occupied the Vice-chair, assisted by Mr. Coote, in consequence of Mr. Lipscombe laboring under a severe cold. The band of Her Majesty's 99th regiment struck up " God save the Queen," when the Governor entered the hall ; and, during dinner and throughout the evening performed a variety of favourite pieces in their usual excellent style.
    Grace having been said by the Archdeacon, the company proceeded to test ,the quality of the viands (provided by Webb) ... (From The Hobart Courier, 24 January, 1854)



    TAHO REF: PH301268
    Above: Captain Langdon, one of the attendees, and
    Below: eccentric lawyer Joseph Hone also sat at Captain Goldsmith's table -



    State Library Tasmania
    Title: [Joseph Hone]
    Publisher: [Hobart : Frederick Frith [185-?]
    Description: 1photograph : sepia ; oval image 12 X 9 cm
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: AUTAS001139592703
    Source: Allport Library and Museum of Fine Arts



    PHOTOGRAPHS ca. 1880s of the NEW MARKET, now CITY HALL



    State Library of Tasmania
    Title: The New Market (Burnt) Roberts and Company Limited
    Description: 1 photographic print
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: NS1013-1-1526



    State Library of Tasmania
    Title: Tasmanian Juvenile Industrial Exhibition Building at New Market - now Hobart City Hall
    Description: 1 photographic print
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: NS1013-1-754

    RELATED POSTS main weblog

    Convict Nathan Hunt 1870s-1890s

    $
    0
    0



    Nathan Hunt, Tasmanian prisoner and habitual offender, transported to Tasmania (Van Diemen's Land) as a teenager (b. ca. 1822) in 1842 on board the "Elphinstone", was sentenced with multiple convictions for larceny thereafter and was still serving a sentence in prison in 1890, aged 68 yrs. He was photographed here at discharge by Thomas J. Nevin on 28 February 1879 at the Hobart Gaol.



    Print from Thomas Nevin's negative of prisoner Nathan Hunt, photographed 1879.



    Source: QVMAG 1985_p_0073

    Recto and verso of print of Tasmanian prisoner Nathan Hunt, aged 57 yrs old, photographed by Thomas Nevin at the Municipal Police, Hobart Town, on Hunt's discharge, 1879.

    POLICE RECORDS



    Nathan Hunt was discharged on 12 April 1871.



    Nathan Hunt was discharged on 7 August 1872.



    Nathan Hunt was discharged on 28 February 1877.



    Nathan Hunt was convicted on 18 January 1879.



    Nathan Hunt was discharged on 16 July 1879.



    Nathan Hunt was discharged on 15 October 1879.



    Nathan Hunt was convicted on 17 January 1880, sentenced to two years for larceny, with eleven prior convictions.



    Nathan Hunt was discharged on 13 February 1884, sentence remitted.

    Source: Tasmania Reports of Crime: Information for Police, Gov't Printer (police gazettes)



    Hobart Gaol Record of Nathan Hunt
    Convicted at the Police Office (P.O.) Hobart, sentenced to 12 months for larceny on 28 October 1890.
    TAHO Ref: GD6719, page 167, conviction

    This later photograph of Nathan Hunt taken by Constable John Nevin was printed in the earlier format of an oval framed carte-de-visite vignette typical of his brother Thomas' commercial method of printing his 1870s mugshots for the Municipal Police Office and Hobart Gaol. Nathan Hunt's age given on the criminal record sheet is 57 yrs old, yet by 1890, Nathan Hunt would have been much older. His age was listed as 65 yrs old when he was discharged on 13 February 1884, and this later photograph certainly shows a man of about that age who has spent a lifetime in and out of prison. He was 57 years old in 1879 (see police gazette notice above), so it can be assumed that an earlier photograph had been pasted to the blue criminal sheet and then removed, to be replaced with the cdv vignette of Nathan Hunt aged, photographed in 1890, aged around 68 years old.

    The first and much earlier photograph, therefore, of Nathan Hunt, was taken in the mid to late 1870s, when he was in his fifties and when he was frequently in and out of prison serving sentences for up to two years for his favorite past time - larceny.

    This last photograph is only the third of four mugshots to surface of a Tasmanian prisoner wearing a prison issue cap; the earlier mugshots taken by Thomas Nevin of prisoners James Mullins and William Smith at the Hobart Gaol in 1875 show both men wearing the "black leathern cap"manufactured by prisoners at Port Arthur in 1873.



    Photos © KLW NFC Imprint 2009 and 2013 ARR
    Mitchell Library SLNSW (PXB 274)

    A prison issue woollen cap also made by prisoners at Port Arthur in 1873, is shown here.



    Convict clothing: woollen hat
    Source: Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery
    REF: QVM_2003_H_0571_cap

    But Nathan Hunt, and another prisoner, Ernest Parker, also convicted in 1890, were photographed at the Hobart Gaol wearing a third type of prison cap made of canvas with a small visor, and with numbers stamped on the front, viz:









    Convict Ernest Parker, Hobart Gaol photograph and record dated 11 August 1890
    TAHO file: GD6719, page 199

    TRANSPORTATION RECORDS for NATHAN HUNT 1842 and 1851




    TAHO REF: con33-1-25_00103_l
    TAHO REF: con14-1-16_00038_l

    Departure of Captain Goldsmith and the 99th Regiment 1855

    $
    0
    0
    Elizabeth Rachel Day, who would become photographer Thomas J. Nevin's fiance in 1868 and wife in 1871, was just 8 yrs old in 1855 (1847-1914) when her two uncles - master mariner Captain Edward Goldsmith, and soldier Captain Henry James Day of the 99th Regiment - prepared to leave Hobart, Tasmania for Europe. Both men were related to Elizabeth Rachel Day's father, master mariner Captain James Day as brother-in-law (Edward Goldsmith married James Day's sister Elizabeth Day) and first cousin (Henry James Day and James Day shared the same paternal grandparents).

    THE GRAND BALL
    A Grand Ball was held at the Victoria Theatre, Hobart on 20th December 1855 in honour of the service rendered to the colony by the 99th Regiment on the eve of their final departure, attended by Captain Goldsmith among a distinguished group of invitees.

    The First Waltz on the Programme, "Les Adieux," was composed by Miss J. V. Smith for the occasion of the "Departure of the 99th Regt. from Hobart Town".



    Programme of the Ball in Farewell to 99 the Regiment printed on silk
    Source: Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office: 
    Crowther Library (also on TAHO site at Flickr)

    The report in the Mercury of 21st December 1855 of the Ball detailed the lavish set-up of the Ball Room at the Victoria Theatre, including a sly reference to Lady Young's ample girth in the mention of "a most commodious seat" provided for her at the upper end of the room.



    GRAND BALL TO THE OFFICERS OF THE 99th REGIMENT. (1855, December 21).
    The Hobarton Mercury (Tas. : 1854 - 1857), p. 5.
    Retrieved January 13, 2014, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article3337222

    TRANSCRIPT
    GRAND BALL TO THE OFFICERS OF THE 99th REGIMENT
    This grand affair came off last night, at the Victoria Theatre, which was splendidly fitted up for the occasion. The stage and Pit were boarded over, and carpeted, and under the centre boxes was inscribed in flowers: -"Success to the 99th.: The pillars supporting the boxes were elegantly festooned with the most beautiful flowers, and from the roof of the theatre were suspended the flags of all nations, friendly to the great cause of civilization. On one side of the ball-room, tables were arranged, for a supply of coffee, tea and lemonade for the ladies, and in the saloon a mots sumptuous supper was displayed, under the able supervision of Mr. Webb whose catering on such occasions, needs no eulogium at our hands we may observe; however, that every delicacy of the season, and especially in fruits from the Pine Apple to the Cherry, was abundantly supplied; in fact the tables were covered with good things, in almost endless profusion. It is but right that we should mention tht the arrangement of the floral display was made by Mr and Mrs Watson, and a more graceful display of floral elegance, we never witnessed. The company began to arrive at about nine o'clock, and the vie of the ball-room from the boxes presented a spectacle, which we could only compare to some fairy scene. In fact, all the bright beauty and fashion of Hobart Town were there, including His Excellency and Lady Young for whom a most commodious seat was provided at the upper end of the Ball-room. As is usual on such occasions, the festivities were prolonged to a late, or rather, to an early hour, when th party broke up, highly delighted with their enjoyment.
    We may add, that His Excellency was received with a Guard of Honor, and on his entrance into the Ball Room, the Band played the National Anthem, the company standing.
    Amongst the visitors we observed, the following citizens:- The Colonial-Secretary, Messrs Anstey and Clerke, M. L. C. , the Speaker, Messrs, A. B. Jones, John and James Dunn, Pitcairn, W. Robertson, R & N. Lewis, Capt. Goldsmith, Doctors Bedford, Jackson & Brock, Messrs. S. Moses, Hull, J. Roberts, Hall, Bowne, B. O'Niele Wilson, D.C.A.C. Ashton, Mills, Mr D'Arch. Mr. Sorell, Col. Hamilton, Capt. Miller, and many others.
    The general public, however, felt excluded from such an exclusive gathering which included only the officers of the 99th Regiment. Instead of a Ball, the writer of this article which appeared in the Colonial Times on 11 December 1855 suggested a public meeting should be convened by the Mayor where the service of the rank and file soldier could be acknowledged, especially as it was rumoured, those men were to be deployed to "the seat of war" once back in Britain.



    The 99th Regiment
    Colonial Times 11 December 1855

    TRANSCRIPT
    THE NINETY-NINTH.
    WE observe that it is in contemplation to give a ball to the officers of the Ninety-ninth Regiment prior to the departure of the corps from this colony. As an expression of good wishes, this is so far very well, but, in our opinion it does not go far enough to meet the case. The Regiment has been for some years amongst us, and its behaviour, generally, has been of a nature to secure the respect and esteem of the citizen : it would be improper therefore, to let it depart without sufficient testimony that such has been the character of its service in the colony. But why should the expression of this feeling be confined exclusively to the officers? Are we under no obligations to the men also ? During the term that the regiment has been here, the town has been visited by more than one calamity, in which the men of the 99th have behaved with exemplary benevolence. In the great fire which destroyed so large a portion of Liverpool street, and threatened to consume a much larger portion of the town, the exertions of the 99th were most praiseworthy, and to it was owing, in no small degree, the stop which was ultimately put to the progress of the devouring element. At other similar though less striking seasons of threatened calamity, the men of the 99th have behaved with the same prompt and steady endeavour to save both life and property. Again, when the town was visited with one of the severest and most devastating floods which its history has ever known, the men of the 99th were the theme of universal admiration for their coolness, and for the readiness with which they devoted themselves to the exigencies of the moment. Whatever services the officers may have rendered to the community, and we are not inclined to dispute them, we yet think that the services of the men should by no means be suffered to pass unrecognized, or unacknowledged. And in this feeling we know we shall be supported by a large class of the community to which the officers are unknown. And now, then, as to the form which the acknowledgment should take. We believe that the better form would be, that the Mayor of the City, as the most proper person, should convene a public meeting to adopt an address to the officers and men of the regiment, which address he should afterwards read to the men at the head of the regiment. This course is often adopted on the occasion of the removal of regiments in Britain, and appears the most feasible, as well as the most proper thing to do here. It is rumoured that, the regiment will ho ordered to the seat of war upon its arrival in England, and this forms, perhaps an additional reason why our acknowledgments should now be
    "tendered it.[sic]

    Source: THE NINETY-NINTH. (1855, December 11). Colonial Times (Hobart, Tas. : 1828 - 1857), p. 2. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article8788822

    CAPTAIN HENRY JAMES DAY, 99th REGIMENT
    Captain Henry James Day (1803-188-?), first cousin of Thomas Nevin's father-in-law, master mariner Captain James Day, was Guard Captain of the 3rd detachment of 99th Regiment of Foot on board the convict transport Candahar when it arrived in Hobart in 1842 with 60 troops under his command, and 249 male convicts. Also on board were a "lady and four children", several soldiers' families and government stores. The Candahar was a 4 gun barque of 642 tons built in Shields in 1840, class A1 which departed Spithead, England on the 2nd April 1842, docking in Van Diemen's Land on the 21st July 1842. Captain Day's arrival was noted in the Hobart Town Courier. The regiment was stationed at the Anglesea Barracks, Hobart.

    On the 10th August 1842 the Candahar departed Hobart Town, Van Dieman's Land for Sydney, N.S.W, arriving on Tuesday the 16th August 1842 laden with government stores. Captain Day and family proceeded to Maitland. Captain Henry James Day served on Norfolk Island again as guard captain of the Sir Robert Seppings, a convict transport hulk which returned to Hobart on 4th October, 1852. He was now accompanied by Mrs Day and eight children, four more than in 1842 when she arrived on the Candahar.

    Detachments of the 99th Regiment were sent from Hobart to Norfolk Island and New Zealand. In 1845 members were sent to New Zealand to quell the Maori rebellion. A detachment took part in the assault on Ohaeawai Pah on 1 July 1845 and on Ruapekapeka on 10th January 1846. The campaign lasted for two years. The regiment returned to Hobart, Tasmania in 1847, stationed there until 1854 when a contingent was sent to Victoria.

    In 1848, Captain Henry James Day was stationed at the Blackheath Stockade, NSW, as assistant engineer and superintendent, but by 1852 he was back in Hobart, VDL. Their stay in Hobart was not without tragedy. One of Captain and Mrs Day's sons, George Henry, aged 5yrs, died on 30 August 1853 while stationed at the Anglesea Barracks. Mrs Eliza Day (nee Eliza Terry, daughter of a proctor in the Vice Admiralty), married Henry James Day at Port Louis, Mauritius in 1832. She was 19, he was 28. He was born into the Imperial Forces on Jamaica, christened in 1803, and commissioned in July 1825. Just as they were born to parents into service in the colonies , so were four of their eight children. Mary Jane was born on Mauritius (1833); Henrietta (1844) and George (1848) were born in NSW, and Arthur Frederick Francis was born on Norfolk Island (1850).  Coincidentally, Thomas Nevin's father, John Nevin, was attested the same year, in 1825, spending the next 12 years from 1826-1838 in the West Indies before serving at the Canadian Rebellions in 1839.

    Eight children were listed on Captain Henry James Day's  service record by 1863, including a son with the same name, Henry James Day, born in 1833. When the family returned again from Norfolk Island to Hobart via Port Arthur on the Southern Cross, Commander George McArthur (347 tons, 2 guns, registry at Hobarton) with the 99th Regiment, on 7 Mach 1855, Henry James Day snr was listed as Major Day, accompanied by Mrs Day, five Miss Day’s and a Master Day (i.e. male child). All seven of his children, with the exception of Henry James jnr, the eldest son, were travelling with him. Also on board were 1 sergeant, 4 corporals, 27 privates, 10 women and 25 children of the 99th Regiment. They had landed 2 prisoners, 4 horses, 2 cows and part of cargo at Port Arthur before proceeding to Maitland, NSW.

    Captain Day served in Australian waters until 1856, proceeded to Bengal 1858-9, and from there he was deployed to the Chinese Rebellions of 1860. He was awarded the Chinese Clasp of Pekin, and retired from the 99th Regiment as Honorary Colonel brevet in 1863.

    Find Henry James Day's (senior) record of service and more officers of the 99th Regiment, for example, Loftus John NUNN, who married Jane Anne Pedder at St Davids on 4 Dec1851.
    Click here - NB this is a large file: The 99th Regiment Records of Officers' Services pdf.
    National Archives UK Ref: WO-76-47-01

    CAPTAIN EDWARD GOLDSMITH, Master Mariner 
    Captain Edward Goldsmith (1804-1869) was the uncle of photographer Thomas J. Nevin's wife, Elizabeth Rachel Day (1847-1914). Her aunt and namesake, Elizabeth Day, sister of her father master mariner Captain James Day, married Edward Goldsmith, master mariner in Yorkshire in 1829. Captain Goldsmith's illustrious career as Master and Commander of the great merchant ships spanned twenty years and almost without incident from his first documented voyage to VDL in 1831 to the sale of his favorite barque, the Rattler, in 1852, the year Thomas Nevin arrived in Hobart as a ten year old child with parents John (a guard and Chelsea out-pensioner) and Mary, and siblings Rebecca Jane, Mary Ann and Jack (William John) on board the Fairlie, a convict transport also carrying soldiers of the 99th Regiment.

    Captain and Elizabeth Goldsmith had two sons: Richard Sidney, born 1830, NSW, who died aged 25yrs in Hobart, in 1854; and the second son who was named after his father, Edward Goldsmith, born at Rotherhithe, UK on December 12,1836. He travelled with his parents on several voyages to Hobart from London before attending Trinity and Caius Colleges Cambridge in 1856-7. In 1855, when Edward Goldsmith jnr was 19 years old, he accompanied his father to the Governor's Levee, an early afternoon reception and ceremony held only for men, at Government House, Hobart. Edward's cousins, the Day sisters, still children under 8yrs, would have been deeply impressed by their older cousin's account of this fine affair.

    By 1854, master mariner Captain Edward Goldsmith had enriched the colony of Tasmania for more than twenty years through his annual voyages in command of merchant ships bringing immigrants, agricultural produce, ship and engineering equipment and fashionable merchandise from Europe and the Americas. He had benefited the colony through the export of Tasmanian horticulture and timbers, especially the blue gum which he exhibited at the Paris Expo in 1855. He constructed the first patent slip on the Domain, and he had bought land in the northern suburbs of Hobart. He was a Director of the Hobart Town and Launceston Marine Insurance Company, established in 1836, and notably for Tasmanians, the builder of the twin steam ship Kangaroo in 1854, operating from McGregor's Patent Slip at the Queen's Domain Hobart. He was a witness at the marriage in 1841 of Rachel Pocock to his brother-in-law James Day, parents of Elizabeth Rachel Nevin and Mary Sophia Axup, nee Day, at St David's Church Hobart on January 6th. He was present too when his eldest son Richard died in Hobart in 1854, aged 25yrs.

    Captain Edward Goldsmith was highly esteemed by both the Hobart City Corporation's Mayor and aldermen and the business community. He attended the Regattas as a judge, and at his testimonial dinner in 1849 at the Hobart Town Hall, he stated that he might become a colonist and settle in Hobart, but that was not to be. He attended many social functions sponsored by the Governor and Mayor before his final departure in 1855, sometimes with his younger son Edward Goldsmith jnr, who accompanied him to the Governor's Levee. The construction of the New Market on the Hobart Wharves, and the banquet held to celebrate its opening in January 1854, was another of his interests and an event he attended in the company of Hobart's most illustrious officers and the colony's most modest traders alike. His final farewell came at the Ball hosted by His Excellency and Lady Young on the eve of departure of the 99th Regiment on 20 December 1855.

    Captain Edward Goldsmith retired to Gadshill, Higham in Kent, to manage his extensive real estate holdings there (50 cottages, houses, orchards and gardens, including the house at 6 Gadshill Place occupied by Charles Dickens), soon after selling up his interest in the patent slip and shipyard on the Queen's Domain Hobart to Alexander McGregor 1855. At the time of the 1861 UK Census, Captain Edward Goldsmith was listed as master mariner, age 56, retired, resident of Higham Lodge, together with his wife Elizabeth, age 54, and servant Louisa Eatten, age 21. Higham Lodge still stands, located across the laneway from the Falstaff Inn and opposite Gadshill House, now a school.

    Edward Goldsmith jnr and his cousins, Mary Sophia Day, Thomas Nevin and Elizabeth Nevin nee Day, Mary's sister, ended up in Chancery over Captain Goldsmith's will in 1872. These two daughters of Captain James Day and nieces of Captain Goldsmith were to have inherited the eleven cottages, No's 1-11, at Vicarage Row, Higham, but their cousin, Edward Goldsmith contested this legacy of his father's will (Ref: National Archives UK C16/781 C546012). More about this extraordinary case in a future article.

    RELATED POSTS main weblog

    John Watt Beattie and the Nevin family legacy

    $
    0
    0
    Thomas J.Nevin was resident of 270 Elizabeth St. Hobart when he died in 1923. The house in which he died was the house where government lithographer and artist William Charles Piguenit (1836-1914) was born. It is now the site of the Elizabeth College. Soon after Thomas J. Nevin's death in 1923, five of his adult children - May, Thomas jnr, George, William and Albert - moved to a house in Newdegate St. North Hobart. They periodically attended the Methodist church located one street behind, in Swan Street, which was also attended by a friend of their father's, photographer John Watt Beattie. At the time of his death in 1930, John Watt Beattie lived at 28 Jordan Hill Road, minutes up the hill from the Nevin's house in Newdegate Street.



    The house at 23 Newdegate St , North Hobart, ca. 1935 with three of Thomas and Elizabeth Nevin's grandchildren
    Copyright © KLW NFC & The Nevin Family Collections 2006-2009 ARR.

    The friendship between these two photographers, Thomas J. Nevin and John Watt Beattie extended back to 1887 on the death of Thomas Nevin's father, John Nevin at the family house and farm adjacent to the Lady Franklin Museum at Kangaroo Valley (renamed Lenah Valley in 1922). It had long been a wish of John Nevin that the Franklin Museum be restored to its original purpose when first built on Jane Franklin's land, named Ancanthe, as a library and botanical museum, but by 1887, it was little more than a storage shed for local orchardists and farmers. As a gesture towards reviving John Nevin's wish, before his own death in 1930 John Watt Beattie approached the Hobart City Corporation with a proposal to house his vast convictaria collection in the Lady Franklin Museum at Kangaroo Valley (Lenah Valley) but the HCC declined.



    The cottage that John Nevin built at Kangaroo Valley (by 1922 renamed Lenah Valley)
    “T.J. Nevin Photo” inscribed on verso, ca. 1868.
    From © The Liam Peters Collection 2010.

    Beattie admired both John Nevin and his son Thomas Nevin for two reasons: John Nevin had been a soldier serving in the West Indies and Canada, a journalist and a poet; and his son Thomas Nevin had been a commercial collaborator of the most notable and prolific photographers of the colonial period 1860s-1870s, Alfred Bock and Samuel Clifford. But Thomas Nevin was important to Beattie for another reason: he also had first-hand experience as a photographer working with police and "convicts", a term rather than "prisoners" which Beattie preferred and applied to Nevin's mugshots of prisoners when setting up displays in his "Port Arthur" convictaria museum to attract the tourist. In admiration of both father and son, Beattie forwarded his copy of John Nevin's poem "My Cottage in the Wilderness" (1868) and several photographs of prisoners taken by Thomas Nevin (1875) to NSW collector David Scott Mitchell. These items were accessioned before 1907 and are still held in the Dixon and DSM Collection in the Mitchell Library, Sydney.



    Prisoner Robert Ogden (1861?-1883), known as James Odgen,
    executed on 4th June 1883 at the Hobart Goal for murder.
    Photographed by Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol, 23 September 1875.
    State Library of NSW
    Digital Order No. a421036
    Miscellaneous Photographic Portraits ca. 1877-1918
    36. James Ogden
    Call Number DL PX 158:





    Prisoner photos by T. Nevin, Mitchell Library NSW (PXB 274)
    Photos copyright © KLW NFC 2009 ARR.

    THE BEATTIE MUSEUM
    John Watt Beattie was a teengager still living in Scotland when professional photographers Alfred Bock, Thomas J. Nevin and Samuel Clifford were most active in Hobart, Tasmania during the 1860s and 1870s.

    When Alfred Bock relocated to Victoria  from Tasmania in 1867, his junior partner Thomas J. Nevin acquired Bock's stock-in-trade in the studio at 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart, which continued to operate as "The City Photographic Establishment." And then, in turn, when Thomas Nevin was appointed full-time to the civil service in 1876 by the Hobart City Corporation at its nerve centre, the Hobart Town Hall, both Bock's and Nevin's commercial negatives and prints were acquired by Nevin's collaborator and close friend Samuel Clifford who advertised this acquisition with a promise to the public that he would print any of Nevin's commercial work on request from former private clientele. When Samuel Clifford closed shop in 1878, all this stock-in-trade including Alfred Bock's and Thomas Nevin's negatives were acquired by the Anson Brothers in Elizabeth St. Hobart.



    Anson Bros studio on right, Elizabeth Street Hobart 1880s
    Title: Old Mr. C. Davis and his son Charlie going home to dinner, July 1907
    Publisher: [Hobart] : Anson, 1887?
    ADRI: AUTAS001131820847
    Source: Allport Library and Museum of Fine Arts

    By 1892, when John Watt Beattie joined the Anson Brothers, he therefore had at hand a vast supply of negatives and prints taken by Alfred Bock,Thomas Nevin and Samuel Clifford, and set about reprinting a great many - without attribution to either or any of these three - for sale at his studio in Elizabeth St Hobart, and display in his shop and "Port Arthur Museum" in Murray St. Hobart. In 1895, Beattie had gained official endorsement with an appointment as government photographer, principally in view of his use to the intercolonial tourism industry. His official status gave him access to prison documents from the Port Arthur penitentiary, the Hobart Gaol and the Municipal Police Office, Hobart Town Hall, where many of Thomas J. Nevin's photographs of prisoners were taken for police records while on commission and in civil service between 1872-1886 (assisted by his brother Constable John Nevin at the Hobart Gaol in later years).

    With similar insouciance when it came to official documents,  Beattie removed many of these prisoners' mugshots which Nevin had supplied in multiple duplicate to the government as standard format carte-de-visite vignettes, both from prisoners' record sheets held at the Sheriff's Office, Hobart  Gaol, and from the Mayor's Court records held by the Hobart City Corporation at the Town Hall. He used these in his displays of convictaria collections in Hobart, and reproduced a dozen or more of Nevin's original negatives as lantern slides for use in his lectures on Tasmanian history, which he labelled as "Imperial Convicts" and "Port Arthur Convicts", despite the fact the bulk of those men whom Nevin had photographed were photographed at the Hobart Gaol and Mayor's Court, Hobart Town Hall as prisoners of the Colonial and not the Imperial Government (1871 onwards), and despite the fact that Nevin photographed offenders for the same reasons that police photograph offenders today - on arrest, conviction, trial, sentence, arraignment and discharge - and not at Port Arthur, which was where habitual offenders were sent after being "received" at the Hobart Gaol in the 1870s until transferred back to the Hobart Gaol once more by 1874 in the face of accusations of corruption levelled at the Port Arthur Commandant (1871-1873), A. H. Boyd by government MPs and public commentators alike.

    Beattie's commercial imperatives regarding Port Arthur as a key to the growth of tourism to Tasmania from the 1890s astounded a visitor to Hobart in 1916 with the South Australian Commission. He became so affronted by John Watt Beattie's commercialism when he "wandered into the Port Arthur Museum" in Hobart, the visitor was moved to write a letter to The Mercury newspaper. His letter was published on 3rd February, 1916:

    He wrote:

    "There are three rooms literally crammed with exhibits ... The question which pressed itself on my mind time and again was, how comes it that these old-time relics which formerly were Government property, are now in private hands? Did the Government sell them or give them away? The same query applies to the small collection in a curiosity shop at Brown's River. Whatever the answer may be, I hold the opinion that the Government would be amply justified in taking prompt steps to repossess them, even though some duplicates may be in the State Museum. Today the collection is valuable and extremely interesting. A century hence it will be priceless. It would surely be unpardonable to allow it to pass into the hands of some wealthy globe-trotter which is the fate awaiting it, unless action be taken to secure it to the State.

    This visitor on government business in Tasmania could hardly have envisioned that the State itself would never be able to do the collection justice, because Beattie had already violated the integrity of the originals, despite making "some duplicates" and lodging them in the "State Museum", by which he meant the institution now known as the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. This was one means whereby the TMAG acquired their originals and duplicates of Nevin's prisoner photographs and commercial prints, including a large number of stereographs. Apart from Nevin's own stock which Samuel Clifford then the Ansons had acquired, two other sources are documented: estrays from the central police registry at the Hobart Town Hall (next door to the TMAG) where Nevin worked in the years 1876-1880 and which housed the Hobart City Corporation, the Municipal Police Office and Office of the Inspector of Police, in addition to the Public Library. Beattie also sourced a number of prisoner photographs from the Sheriff's Office at the Hobart Gaol when the old photographers' room was demolished in 1915. The other source of the TMAG collection is the "borrowing" of originals and copies by staff ca. 1982-1987 at the TMAG in Hobart from Beattie's donated collection located at the QVMAG, Launceston (viz. Elspeth Wishart) , further compounding Beattie's suppression of photographic attribution to his earlier sources. The TMAG staff proceeded with their unsubstantiated (and highly subjective) suppositions based on Beattie's donations, adding a flurry of nonsense in Nevin's entry,  when their publication Tasmanian Photographers 1840-1940 was printed in 1995 (Chris Long and Gillian Winter ed et al) .




    DEATH OF MR. J. W. BEATTIE. (1930, June 25). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 7. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article29802442
    Read the full obituary here [pdf]

    He had offered this collection to the Hobart Corporation, but the negotiations were not successful. It was his idea that the collection should find a resting place in the Lady Franklin Museum building at Lenah Valley.



    The bridge in the foreground crosses the rivulet. The Lady Franklin Museum sits below the site where John Nevin built his cottage (now demolished), next to the house (pictured) above on the rise at 270A Lenah Valley Rd. Photo © KLW NFC Imprint 2012 ARR

    DRY PLATE PHOTOGRAPHY
    A family member and photohistorian Jack Cato published this account in 1955 of John Watt Beattie's use of dry plate photography, claiming that Beattie was the first to use gelatine dry plates in 1879; however, that was not exactly what had Beattie claimed. Beattie was quoted in the Mercury's obituary as saying that on an excursion to Lake St. Clair - "That was the first time gelatine dry plates were used at the lake" - which was in reference to earlier excursions at Lake St. Clair where amateur photographer Morton Allport had produced images of members of his party and the surrounding landscape ca. 1863:



    Boviak Beach, Excursion to Lake St. Clair February 1863 by Morton Allport
    Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office: Allport Library and Museum of Fine Arts
    Also on TAHO at Flickr page



    Extract from John Watt Beattie's obituary, The Mercury June 25, 1930, in which Beattie is quoted as saying that he was the first to use gelatine dry plates at the lake. When Jack Cato repeated this claim in 1955, he omitted the phrase "at the lake" and inflated the claim to affirm that Beattie was the first - in 1879 - to use gelatine dry plates.



    Jack Cato, The Story of the Camera in Australia 1955 2 edn 1977 Institute of Australian Photography
    From Chapter xv - read the full chapter [pdf]

    Neither claim was true. More than a decade earlier, in March 1866, professional photographer Alfred Bock was at the Port Arthur  penitentiary, 60kms south of Hobart, in the process of photographing the landscape and the prison's officials when he ran out of dry plates, and sent an urgent telegram to professional photographer Samuel Clifford in Hobart to send him "24 dry plates - Panoramic" on the boat called the Shannon.



    March 1866 Account of Private Telegrams
    Date 27th March, No. 269, Alfred Bock to Mr Clifford Liverpool St. H. Town,
    "Send down 24 dry Plates Panoramic. by the Shannon,  at once. - Reply."
    Source:
    Tasmanian Papers 316 (microfilm)
    Records of Telegrams sent and received between Hobart and Port Arthur 1863-1871
    Mitchell Library, State Library NSW
    Photos © KLW NFC Imprint 2013

    And in the same year, 1866, Samuel Clifford produced his much praised dry plate photographs using Russell's Tannin Process, which were exhibited at the Melbourne Intercolonial Exhibition in 1866. The pseudonymous "Sol" remarked of Clifford's expertise (in Dan Sprod 1977l; Joan Kerr 1992:164):
    Surely no wet photography ever excelled these delightful representations of nature.



    Franklin Square, photo by Samuel Clifford  processed with the Russell Tannin dry plate process 1866.
    Blind stamp impress on border. NA UK Ref: CO 1069-621-05
    Held at the National Archives UK. Also at Flickr.

    It is a common misconception that dry plate photography using gelatine was neither known about nor used by Tasmanian photographers in the 1860s, even up to the mid 1870s. Spurling claimed to be the first to introduce it in 1879 (according to Long, TMAG 1995:106), and Beattie claimed to be the first to use gelatine dry plates "at the lake" - i.e. at Lake St Clair, also in 1879, yet publications such as The Photographic News and The Silver Sunbeam (Toller 1864), both read regularly by the Bock-Clifford-Nevin-Allport cohort, provided specific step-by-step guides. This extract is from van Monckhoven, Désiré van. A Popular Treatise on Photography. Translated By W.H. Thornthwaite. London, 1863.:

    CHAPTER XII:
    3. The Tannin Process
    This dry process derives its name from the use of tannin-a bitter principle obtained from gall-nuts a preservative agent. To Major Russell is due the credit of having introduced it.
    The glass to be prepared should be cleaned with great care, particularly from any greasy substances. This is conveniently done with a mixture of Tripoli powder, spirits of wine, and solution of ammonia. A tuft of cotton is dipped into this mixture and rubbed over its surface for a minute or so; then well rinsed in water and rubbed dry with a clean cloth.
    The glass, just before being used, should be wiped with a perfectly dry and warm cloth, and then coated with the following solution:--
    Nelson's Patent Gelatine 20 grains.
    Distilled Water 10 ounces.
    Alcohol ½ ounce.
    Dissolve and filter; this solution will keep good for a considerable time.
    This gelatine solution is applied to the glass in the same way as ordinary collodion, taking care that the whole of the surface is covered, and that the back of the plate be net soiled. The superfluous liquid is received back into the bottle, and the plate set to dry, as shown at Fig. 69; when well drained, remove the accumulation of fluid very carefully from the lower edge of the plate by a piece of blotting-paper drawn along it. When the surface is dry, warm gently by the fire, and retain for use in a grooved box. As plates thus coated will keep good any length of time, any required number may be prepared, taking care that the backs of them are quite free from stains of gelatine.
    The gelatinised glass is now coated with old iodised collodion in the usual manner, taking particular care that the whole surface of the plate be covered; it is then immersed in the silver-bath employed for the wet collodion process (page 34), and allowed to remain in it from three to five minutes.
    Remove the sensitive plate from the bath, and wash it freely under a water-tap for about a minute, it will then be ready to receive the preservative solution, composed as follows:
    Tannin 60 grains.
    Distilled Water 4 ounces.
    Filter through paper, and measure out two separate portions according to the size of the plate to be prepared, allowing about two drachms in each quantity for a stereoscopic plate. The first portion of tannin solution is poured over the washed coating of the sensitised plate two or three times, so as to remove the water adherent to it, then the other quantity is poured on and off, and the plate placed on end on a piece of blotting-paper, and allowed to dry in a perfectly dark and warm place.
    After exposure in the camera, which averages from one to three minutes on a favourable day, and from four to eight minutes in dull weather, the picture is to be developed, for which purpose the following solutions are required:--
    No. 1. Pyrogallic Acid 72 grains.
    Alcohol 1 ounce.
    Dissolve and keep in a stoppered bottle.
    No. 2. Nitrate of Silver 20 grains.
    Citric Acid 20 grains.
    Distilled Water 1 ounce.
    Dissolve and filter should any white or other precipitate be formed. To three ounces of distilled water add half a drachm of No. 1, and if the plate to be developed be a stereoscopic size, take three drachms of this solution and add to it from ten to twenty minims of No. 2; this forms the developing fluid.
    The exposed plate is first moistened with distilled water, which must be done quickly and evenly, otherwise stains are produced, and then the developing fluid poured over its surface and kept slightly in motion. The development must be carefully watched, and if' in a short time the sky comes out strongly, but, is not followed by the other details of the object, the plate was not long enough exposed, and the developing fluid must be poured back into the measure, and say ten minims of No. 1 added, so as to increase the quantity of pyrogallic acid. If the whole of the picture, however, appears to come out at once, a few drops of No. 2 is to be added, so as to increase the density of the sky.
    When the picture is properly developed, it is fixed with a solution of hyposulphite of soda, washed and varnished as described for the wet collodion process.

    THE LEGACY
    As Chris Long - with no hint of irony, given his admiration for Beattie's landscapes - prevaricates in this statement about Beattie's legacy in Tasmania Photographers 1840-1940 (TMAG 1995: 14):
    Undoubtedly, Beattie was the greatest documentary photographer of his generation in Tasmania.  As such, he has been increasingly accorded the status of popular legend, and has been credited with many achievements which were not his own.
    On the same page, to illustrate his point, Chris Long points to this photograph titled "Port Arthur during occupation A. D. 1860" reprinted by Beattie with no acknowledgment by Beattie to the Samuel Clifford, the original photographer.







    This image at the Archives Office of Tasmania, unattributed and dated 1880, is the same as the photograph (below) held at the State Library NSW. Very strange indeed is that this photograph with the same title - which was printed before Beattie by the Ansons Brothers, who reprinted it from Clifford and/or Nevin's stereograph taken in the 1860s at Port Arthur - should turn up in an Anson album at the Mitchell Library, SLNSW, with a faint pencilled inscription on the right-hand bottom corner below the image with this note:
    "Enlargement from a stereoscopic view by A H Boyd Esq."


    Album: Anson Bros., Settlement of Port Arthur (Penal Settlement ) Past and Present.
    The SLNSW has two copies (PXD512/f4 and PXD513/f6), cross referenced to the image with the A. H.  Boyd inscription at PXD 511/f10. Photos © KLW NFC 2009 ARR

    The image of a building in the Anson album is not a vignetted carte-de-visite photograph of a man in prison clothing. Yet this same photograph was - and still is - THE ONLY PHOTOGRAPH in existence with A. H. Boyd's name inscribed that is supposed to PROVE the non-photographer A. H. Boyd, Commandant at the Port Arthur prison 1871-73, took the very same photographs of prisoners, specifically those 84 mugshots held at the National Library of Australia which were originally taken by Nevin in the 1870s, accessioned by the NLA in 1982 from estrays donated by Dr Gunson (and an album by John McPhee in 1985) and correctly attributed to Nevin in the late 20th century by reputable photohistorians who researched Nevin's work over two decades, viz. Professor Joan Kerr, State librarian Geoff Stilwell and curator of Nevin's exhibition in 1977, John McPhee. In all the years since, this very faint and very fake inscription has inspired liars and plagiarists to claim some special "artistic" relation to A.H. Boyd, whether his descendants with a desire to see this known bully Boyd come up from history smelling like roses, or plagiarising "interpreters" at heritage sites who have seen these weblogs about Nevin, and viewed them as gold on the street just there to be picked up and "unpicked" in the most gratuitously abusive and superficial manner (Julia Clark et al). Not a single genuine and original photograph of A.H. Boyd or by A.H. Boyd has ever been published by these latter apologists to date.

    This, then, is the two-faceted legacy of John Watt Beattie's friendship with the poet John Nevin and his son, photographer Thomas James Nevin during the 1880s-1920s.



    Geoff Stilwell, Special Collections, State Library of Tasmania
    Nevin's biographer (with Joan Kerr 1992: 256)

    RELATED POSTS main weblog

    The Governor's Levee 1855: Captain Goldsmith and son

    $
    0
    0
    At the Governor's Levee
    17 January 1855 Colonial Times

    Wife of photographer Thomas Nevin, Elizabeth Rachel Nevin nee Day, was named after her father's sister Elizabeth Goldsmith nee Day who married Captain Edward Goldsmith at Liverpool, UK, in 1829. Captain and Elizabeth Goldsmith had two sons: Richard Sidney, born 1830, NSW, who died aged 25yrs in Hobart, in 1854; and the second son who was named after his father, Edward Goldsmith, born at Rotherhithe, UK on December 12,1836. He travelled with his parents on several voyages to Hobart from London before attending Trinity and Caius Colleges Cambridge in 1856-7. In 1855, when Edward Goldsmith jnr was 19 years old, he accompanied his father to the Governor's Levee, an early afternoon reception and ceremony held only for men, at Government House, Hobart. Edward's cousins, the Day sisters, still children under 8yrs, would have been deeply impressed by their older cousin's account of this fine affair.



    State Library of Tasmania
    Title: Ball-room, Government House / Sharp photo
    Creator: Sharp, John Mathieson, 1823-1899
    In: Abbott album Item 52
    Publisher: 1860
    Description: 1 stereoscopic pair of photographs : sepia toned ; 8 x 7 cm. each
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: AUTAS001136189065
    Source: W.L. Crowther Library



    Government House Drawing Room ca. 1868
    Photographer's blindstamp impress: S. Clifford Hobart Town Tasmania
    Special Collections: University of Tasmania

    WHO's WHO in HOBART 1855
    This is the list of those who attended, published in The Colonial Times (Hobart), 17 January 1855. The text below has not been corrected from its original Trove NLA digitisation. The Levee was also reported with some variations in details of events and omission of names in The Colonial Times of 13 January 1855.

    "THE GOVERNOR'S LEVEE.

    His Excellency Sir Henry E. F. Young

    held a levee yesterday in the Ball Room of Government House at 2 o'clock in the af- ternoon. His Excellency who wore the customary uniform of a Governor, entered the reception-room at a quarter to two, at- tended by Colonel Last and the Aide-de- camp. The principal officers of the Govern- ment, and others who enjoy the privilege of the entrée, were first presented, namely, their Honors the Chief Justice and Puisne

    Judge, the Collector of Customs, Colonial Secretary, Colonial Treasurer, Surveyor General, Attorney-General, Chief Police Magistrate, Colonial Auditor, the Lord Bishop of Tasmania, Deputy Commissary General, Major of Brigade, Comptroller General, Postmaster-General, the Sheriff, Chairman of Quarter Sessions, Immigration   Officer, Port Officer, Major-General Des- pard, and the Vicar-General.

    A Guard of Honour, furnished by H.M.   99th, was in attendance, and the splendid   band of the regiment performed some favor- ite airs during the ceremony.

    We subjoin a list of the gentlemen pre- sented, distinguishing ministers of religion, gentlemen of the bar, Members of the Le- gislative Council, Corporation, &c.

    Ministers of Religion. - The Lord Bishop, Archdeacon Davies. Revs Benjamin Ball, W. R. Bennett, J. Burrowes, J. R. Buckland, A. Davenport, L. Davies, T. Ewing, Dr. Fry, E Freeman, J R. Gurney, J. T. Gellibrand, D. Galor, J B. Seaman, J. Wright, R. Wilson, (Church of England ) the Vicar-Ge neral, Revs. G Hunter, W. J. Dunne, A McGuire, C. Woods, (Roman Catholic,) Revs Dr Lillie, A. Cairnduff, P. Campbell, C. Simson (Church of Scotland,) Revs. W. Day, H J. D'Emden, E. Miller, J. Nisbet, J. M Strongman (Independent,) Revs. W Nicolson, W. R. Wade, (Free Church of Scotland,) Rev. M. Andrew, (Wesleyan,) Rev. K. Johnston, (Baptist,) Rev. Dr. Hoelzel. (Rabbi )

    Members of the Legislative Council, &c. -Dr Butler (Brighton), R Cleburne (Huon), Chapman (Hobart Town), Dunn (Hobart Town), Greg- son (Richmond), Morrison (Sorell), Dr. Officer (Buckingham), Sharland (Hamilton), Sinclair (Morven), Mr. Henslowe, Clerk of the Council, and Major Frazer, Sergeant at-Arms.

    Corporation_His Worship W. G. Elliston (Mayor of Hobart), Aldermen Lipscombe, O'Reilly, Rheuben, Sims, Sly, Thomson, the Town Clerk City Surveyor, City Collector,

    Members of the Bar.-Attorney-General, Crown Solicitor, Commissioner of Insolvent, Court, Messrs. Allport, Brewer, Dobson, Graves,   Harris, Knight, Nicholson, Perry, Pritchard,   Pitcairn, Sorell, Sutton, Watkins, Young.

    A,

    J N. Allport, Abbott, A.C.O. Atkins, Sir H. Atkinson, Ashton, H. Atkinson Jno. Abbott, Dr. Agnew, Austin, Arnold. T.

    B,

    Bates S. A., Burnett J. L Boothman E. Brent; Beaumont; Butler E. W. D. Butler,     R.; Butler, F.; Butler, C. H.; Butler, Alfred       J.; Browne J. M. C.; Barnard J., Benson, Dr.     Boyes, Bisdee Jno. jun.. Boot T , Buckland, Boyes H , Brent T., Butcher, Buckland J A., Bright Dr., Buckland H , Black, Jno , Brock Dr., Bryan R. B., Barker R., Burgess Mur ray, Best H.

    C.

    Culley C. T., Carns Dr., Crosby W, Crouch. Chalmers Capt., Cartwright, Carter W., Cor-   bett Lieut. A., Cowle T. P., Cox T. F., Cotton, Major, Coverdale Dr., Campbell J. P., Crooke Dr., Campbell J. W., Cane F. .

    D.

    Dunn, Dixon J., Downing, Deakin J. E. Dawson S. R., Dickinson Jno., Dickson B. junr, Dandridge.

    E.

    Ely Lt., 99th, Edgar, Evans M.  

    F.

    Forster G. B., (P. M. Pontville), Forster Chas., Ferguson, Fletcher G. W., Fletcher W. Feneran, Fiddick, Forster, Brooks, Forster Jno., Forster Jno., Franck, E., Forster G., Fletcher J. W., Flaherty J. R.

    G. Gell P. H. Gresley N Guy B, Giblin W, Giblin T., Gilles O. H., Gill W. H., Giblin R., Goldsmith Capt, Goldsmith E jun, Gray R. G. Gardiner A, Gresley R. E. P, Gould J. M, Gaze O.



    "Goldsmith Capt, Goldsmith E.jun."

    H.

    Horne Thomas, Haig A. Hardinge, Haller F. Huybers A. Hall Dr. Hopkins H, Harrison G. T. Hutton, Hewitt, Hall F, Harrison J, Hawkins Capt. R.E , HalI ( Tolosa). Hampton G, Hewitt T. E, Hall John, Hall C. W.

    J.

    Johnson Capt. 99th, Jones A. B, Jean, Jeffery S. Jacobs, L Grand Lieut.-Col. (Bombay Army),

    Jackson Dr.

    K.

    Knight W, Kay W. P, Kearney, Kerr John, Kenny Lieut.-Col. Kemp A. F, Kilburn D. T,

    Kirwan, Kennett, Knox.

    L.    

    Lowes T. Y, Low J. J, Lewis R, Lewis Neil, Lewis T, Lulham Capt, Lavender C. W.

    M.

    McCarthy Dr. McArdell I. O. O, Miller Capt, McLachlan, Milligan Dr, Mason C. Kemble, Macnamara Dr, Moses S, Matson G, McPherson D, Mills E. McKay Capt. Maning H, McGowan J T, Murphy L. E, Murdoch J, McKeig G. A, Moore J. A. Moss P, May J, M, Milward J, Midwood, Midwood E.

    N.

    Nairne, Newman, Neill G. J, Nicol P.

    O.

    O'Donohoo, Ogilvy Capt, Orr A.

    P. Pritchard, Pike, Proctor, Proctor G. M,

    Illegible

    R. Reaves L G Lieut. 99th; Russell,   Major (Staff Officer of Pensioners); Read, Row   croft Horace, Roope Lavington, Rogers L. G.

    S.

    Smales J. H, Smith H. E, Stevenson G Smyly, Lieut.-Col. 99th; Stanfield. J. W. Shaw   C. C. Solomon Joseph, Swan John, Stewart J L. Smith Dr. Smith H. Seal M, Swan John, jun. Scott S, Scott H. W, Smith, J. G, Schaw Major, (P. M. Richmond).

    T.

    Tully A, Tribe F, Tarleton (P.M. New Nor folk), Trappes, Turnbull James, Taylor G. L,

    Truro.

    V.

    Vautin.

    W.

    Webster A, Watt R. G, Aug. H Eardley Wil- mot (P.M. Hobart), Williams J. B, Wilmot C. Eardley. Whyte C. J. Wood J. R, Walker R. Wettenhall Lt. R.N, Walker J. C. Wigmore R, Wilson E. (Melbourne), Windsor W. H, Wynne R, Wood G. F. G, Whyte James, Waterhouse R. S, Watt T, Wilson B. O. N. Windsor.

    Y.

    Yeoland W. K, Young C. H.

    The Lord Bishop, Vicar-General, and most of the clergymen of the churches of England and Rome were attired in eccle- siastical robes. The Chief Justice, Chair- man of Quarter Sessions, Attorney-Gene- ral, &c, also wore their official gowns.

    It will be seen by the list that the pre- sentations were numerous, and the cere- mony lasted until about a quarter to three."



    View of the Derwent Hobart from Government House
    Special Collections University of Tasmania (n.s; n.d.)

    LEAVING HOBART for GADSHILL, KENT



    The Courier 19 December 1855

    TRANSCRIPT
    NOTICE
    CAPTAIN GOLDSMITH, being about to leave the colony, particularly requests that all Claims against him be forthwith sent in for liquidation.
    Broadland House, 17th Dec. 1855

    Broadland House was situated on the corner of Collins and Elizabeth Street (site of the present ANZ Bank), very close to the Hobart wharves. Captain Goldsmith's usual residence while in Hobart was in Davey Street, where his elder son Richard Sidney Goldsmith died, aged 25, the previous year (Obituary, The Courier Hobart 5 August 1854),  but as he began preparations to leave the colony altogether, he vacated the house and took rooms at Broadland House which was still respectable enough to be considered by the Police as a lodging house not to be entered under their powers of the Legislative Council's Act passed for the "well ordering and regulation of Common Lodging-Houses", if this article published in The Colonial Times, 3 September 1855 is to be believed, although by the 1860s, the clientele was somewhat downmarket (Mercury 15 December 1862).



    Broadland House
    The Colonial Times, 3 September 1855

    So by Christmas 1855, Captain Edward Goldsmith was headed back to Gadshill, Higham, Kent, UK, where he owned more than fifty properties, including cottages, orchards, and gardens, as well town houses in nearby Rochester and farms near the marshes at Gravesend, a place now familiar to the world from Dickens' portrayal in Great Expectations (1860-61).  Captain Goldsmith also had contractual interests in renovations and improvements to Gadshill House which extended beyond Charles Dickens' purchase in 1858, and which remained in the estate of Captain Goldsmith on his death in 1869. He owned the house at 11 Upper Clarence Place, Maidstone Road, Rochester, Kent. where Charles Dickens' mistress Ellen Ternan was born. Her neighbour at No. 13 was Captain Goldsmith's son, Edward Goldsmith jnr, whose income in the 1881 Census was "houses".

    Edward Goldsmith jnr and his cousins, Mary Sophia Day, Thomas Nevin and Elizabeth Nevin nee Day, Mary's sister, ended up in Chancery over Captain Goldsmith's will in 1872. These two daughters of Captain James Day and nieces of Captain Goldsmith were to have inherited the eleven cottages, No's 1-11, at Vicarage Row, Higham, but their cousin, Edward Goldsmith contested this legacy of his father's will (Ref: National Archives UK C16/781 C546012). More about this extraordinary case in a future article.

    This is how the marshes look today;

    ours was the marsh country

    Courtesy of Simon K at Flickr, with much gratitude

    "Cooling churchyard, and these marshes, are the setting for the opening of Great Expectations, by Charles Dickens:"

    Ours was the marsh country, down by the river, within, as the river wound, twenty miles of the sea. My first most vivid and broad impression of the identity of things, seems to me to have been gained on a memorable raw afternoon towards evening. At such a time I found out for certain, that this bleak place overgrown with nettles was the churchyard; and that Philip Pirrip, late of this parish, and also Georgiana wife of the above, were dead and buried; and that Alexander, Bartholomew, Abraham, Tobias, and Roger, infant children of the aforesaid, were also dead and buried; and that the dark flat wilderness beyond the churchyard, intersected with dykes and mounds and gates, with scattered cattle feeding on it, was the marshes; and that the low leaden line beyond was the river; and that the distant savage lair from which the wind was rushing, was the sea; and that the small bundle of shivers growing afraid of it all and beginning to cry, was Pip.

    Charles Dickens and Captain Goldsmith at Gadshill 1857

    $
    0
    0
    "Wild legends are in circulation among the servants how that Captain Goldsmith on the knoll above--the skipper in that crow's-nest of a house--has millions of gallons of water always flowing for him. Can he have damaged my well? Can we imitate him, and have our millions of gallons? Goldsmith or I must fall, so I conceive."

    Charles Dickens, Letter to Henry Austin, from Gad's Hill, June 6th 1857



    Auction Catalogue for Gadshill House 1870

    Captain Goldsmith Heads Home to Higham
    Nurseryman and Alderman Frederick Lipscombe proved to be Captain Goldsmith's nemesis by 1855. Deep-seated resentments dividing locally-born colonists and their wealthy British overlords - those "Heads of Establishment" who had amassed personal fortunes on the back of convict transportation - lie at the heart of the row Lipscombe instigated over a trivial matter, the arrival on Captain Goldsmith's barque the Rattler of mouldy Mammoth strawberry plants in 1849. This was the excuse for Lipscombe's misrepresentation in the press in 1853 of Goldsmith as a Committee member and supporter of the Demonstration by The Anti-Transportation League proposed during the Jubilee, an affiliation which Goldsmith firmly denied all knowledge of in reply, stating he only ever agreed to sit on the Gardeners and Amateurs' Committee. The final straw came when Lipscombe proposed to Council that a slaughterhouse be constructed next to Captain Goldsmith's shipyard on the Domain, reported in the Mercury, 27 July 1855:
    The Government proposes to give land for the erection of a slaughter house,at Cornelian Bay; being near the river, most cattle vessels would be able to land their cargoes there. The matter has been discussed in the Municipal Council. Alderman Lipscombe objects to the site, and proposes another near-Captain Goldsmith's ship-building yard. The whole matter is to be submitted to the Legislative Council. The municipality spends at present about £16,000 per annum for salaries and labours, and it proposes to ask the Government for endowments of land and grants from the sale of land; the latter they are not likely to obtain at present, because the Government wants money for general purposes....
    The patent slip and shipyard at the Queen's Domain in Hobart was established by Captain Edward Goldsmith in 1854 from machinery he brought out from London on the Rattler. He obtained a long lease on the foreshore of the Domain from Sir William Denison to lay the slip on the condition that the terms of the lease were fulfilled. He withdrew from the lease in 1855 for several reasons: costs and prison labor; Lipscombe's proposal of a slaughterhouse in the vicinity; the death of his 25 yr old son Richard Sidney Goldsmith the previous year; and a desire to return to Kent in retirement. Alexander McGregor bought Captain Goldsmith's interest.in 1885, in answer to this advertisement:



    Notice of Captain Goldsmith's sale at the slip, Hobart Courier, 12th November 1855.

    TRANSCRIPT
    12th November 1855
    TO SHIPBUILDERS, CONTRACTORS, AND OTHERS
    Unreserved Clearing Sale of the well selected and thoroughly seasoned Gum, Planking, Knees, Treenails, English Pine Spars, Yards, Cut Deals, Huon Pine in Logs; also Pitch, New Ten-ton Launch, Punts, &c, &c,, at the Yard of Captain Goldsmith, Government Domain.
    By 1854, master mariner Captain Edward Goldsmith had enriched the colony of Tasmania for more than twenty years through his annual voyages in command of merchant ships bringing immigrants, agricultural produce, ship and engineering equipment and fashionable merchandise from Europe and the Americas. He had benefited the colony through the export of Tasmanian horticulture and timbers, especially the blue gum which he exhibited at the Paris Expo in 1855. He constructed the first patent slip on the Domain, and he had bought land in the northern suburbs of Hobart. He was a Director of the Hobart Town and Launceston Marine Insurance Company, established in 1836, and notably for Tasmanians, the builder of the twin steam ship Kangaroo in 1854. He was a witness at the marriage in 1841 of Rachel Pocock to his brother-in-law James Day, parents of Elizabeth Rachel Nevin and Mary Sophia Axup, nee Day, at St David's Church Hobart on January 6th. He was present too when his eldest son Richard died in Hobart in 1854, aged 25yrs.

    Captain Edward Goldsmith was highly esteemed by both the Hobart City Corporation's Mayor and aldermen and the business community. He attended the Regattas as a judge, and at his testimonial dinner in 1849 at the Hobart Town Hall, he stated that he might become a colonist and settle in Hobart, but that was not to be. He attended many social functions sponsored by the Governor and Mayor before his final departure in 1855, sometimes with his younger son Edward Goldsmith jnr, who accompanied him to the Governor's Levee. The construction of the New Market on the Hobart Wharves, and the banquet held to celebrate its opening in January 1854, was another of his interests and an event he attended in the company of Hobart's most illustrious officers and the colony's most modest traders alike. His final farewell came at the Ball hosted by His Excellency and Lady Young on the eve of departure of the 99th Regiment on 20 December 1855. The previous day, he had placed a notice in The Courier of his departure for settlement of unpaid claims:



    The Courier 19 December 1855

    TRANSCRIPT
    NOTICE
    CAPTAIN GOLDSMITH, being about to leave the colony, particularly requests that all Claims against him be forthwith sent in for liquidation.
    Broadland House, 17th Dec. 1855

    At Gad's Hill, Higham, Kent
    When master mariner Captain Edward Goldsmith (1804-1869) prepared his final departure from Hobart Tasmania in December 1855 after more than two decades of commanding merchant ships back and forth from London to Australia via South America and South Africa, he said goodbye to his nieces Elizabeth Rachel Day, aged 8yrs, and her 2yr old sister Mary Sophia Day, daughters of his wife's brother, Captain James Day. Although he would never see them again, he remembered them through generous provisions in his will, which on his death in 1869, named both nieces, as well as Elizabeth Rachel's husband by 1871, photographer Thomas J. Nevin, as legatees, an event which led Mary Sophia Day to file a Chancery Suit in 1871 (Ref: National Archives UK C16/781 C546012) . More about this extraordinary case in a later post.

    On retirement from the merchant marine trade,Captain Goldsmith returned to the area around Chalk in Kent where he was born, settling at Higham with Elizabeth his wife, to oversee his extensive freehold and leasehold properties. The 1861 Census listed his residence at Higham Lodge, across Forge Lane from the Sir John Falstaff Inn. The brick wall of Higham Lodge is visible in this postcard view, adjacent to the Inn wall plastered with theatrical bills.



    Postcard: Sir John Falstaff Inn, Gad's Hill, Published by Hartmann Saxony, 1905


    Postcard, Gad's Hill, 1907. Source: CityArk, Medway, UK.



    1861 UK Census:
    Captain Edward Goldsmith, retired master mariner, age 56, resident of Higham Lodge, together with his wife Elizabeth, age 54, and servant Louisa Eatten, age 21.



    Higham Lodge, foreground, Falstaff Inn on right in distance, the Gadshill House sign opposite.
    Google maps 2013

    Charles Dickens' Water Supply and Letter Box



    Victoria & Albert Museum
    Charles Dickens,
    Coloured albumen carte-de-visite, J & C Watkins,[1863]
    Museum no. 1712:21-1956

    Aside: This coloured cabinet portrait of Dickens taken in 1863 shows the two most common tints favoured by photographers: red and violet. Similar red and violet tinting, some inept and applied by the purchaser rather than the photographer, is evident too in Thomas Nevin's coloured portraits of private clientele.

    When Charles Dickens (1812-1870) settled finally into the house at 6 Gad's Hill Place, Higham, Kent (UK) in 1857, his attention was drawn to Captain Goldsmith on two most urgent matters - the water supply to his house and the location of the mail box, both of which Captain Goldsmith seemed to monopolise. At first, Dickens' excitement at buying the property knew no bounds. These extracts are from his letters. On January 17th, 1857, he wrote -

    [Sidenote: M. de Cerjat.]

                         TAVISTOCK HOUSE, _Monday Night, Jan, 17th, 1857._

    MY DEAR CERJAT,
    ...Down at Gad's Hill, near Rochester, in Kent--Shakespeare's Gad's Hill,
    where Falstaff engaged in the robbery--is a quaint little country-house
    of Queen Anne's time. I happened to be walking past, a year and a half
    or so ago, with my sub-editor of "Household Words," when I said to him:
    "You see that house? It has always a curious interest for me, because
    when I was a small boy down in these parts I thought it the most
    beautiful house (I suppose because of its famous old cedar-trees) ever
    seen. And my poor father used to bring me to look at it, and used to say
    that if I ever grew up to be a clever man perhaps I might own that
    house, or such another house. In remembrance of which, I have always in
    passing looked to see if it was to be sold or let, and it has never been
    to me like any other house, and it has never changed at all." We came
    back to town, and my friend went out to dinner. Next morning he came to
    me in great excitement, and said: "It is written that you were to have
    that house at Gad's Hill. The lady I had allotted to me to take down to
    dinner yesterday began to speak of that neighbourhood. 'You know it?' I
    said; 'I have been there to-day.''O yes,' said she, 'I know it very
    well. I was a child there, in the house they call Gad's Hill Place. My
    father was the rector, and lived there many years. He has just died, has
    left it to me, and I want to sell it.''So,' says the sub-editor, 'you
    must buy it. Now or never!'" I did, and hope to pass next summer there,
    though I may, perhaps, let it afterwards, furnished, from time to time....

    But serious issues soon emerged "on the great estate" a few months later. On June 6th, he wrote -

    [Sidenote: Mr. Henry Austin.]

                                   GAD'S HILL, _Saturday, June 6th, 1857._

    MY DEAR HENRY,

    Here is a very serious business on the great estate respecting the water
    supply. Last night, they had pumped the well dry merely in raising the
    family supply for the day; and this morning (very little water having
    been got into the cisterns) it is dry again! It is pretty clear to me
    that we must look the thing in the face, and at once bore deeper, dig,
    or do some beastly thing or other, to secure this necessary in
    abundance. Meanwhile I am in a most plaintive and forlorn condition
    without your presence and counsel. I raise my voice in the wilderness
    and implore the same!!!

    Wild legends are in circulation among the servants how that Captain
    Goldsmith on the knoll above--the skipper in that crow's-nest of a
    house--has millions of gallons of water always flowing for him. Can he
    have damaged my well? Can we imitate him, and have our millions of
    gallons? Goldsmith or I must fall, so I conceive.

    If you get this, send me a telegraph message informing me when I may
    expect comfort. I am held by four of the family while I write this, in
    case I should do myself a mischief--it certainly won't be taking to
    drinking water.

                                  Ever affectionately (most despairingly).



    In a letter to Henry Austin on 15 August 1857, the water supply problem had been solved with a bore. Dickens wrote -

    [Sidenote: Mr. Henry Austin.]

                            GAD'S HILL PLACE, _Saturday, Aug. 15th, 1857._

    MY DEAR HENRY,

    At last, I am happy to inform you, we have got at a famous spring!! It
    rushed in this morning, ten foot deep. And our friends talk of its
    supplying "a ton a minute for yourself and your family, sir, for
    nevermore."

    They ask leave to bore ten feet lower, to prevent the possibility of
    what they call "a choking with sullage." Likewise, they are going to
    insert "a rose-headed pipe;" at the mention of which implement, I am
    (secretly) well-nigh distracted, having no idea of what it means. But I
    have said "Yes," besides instantly standing a bottle of gin. Can you
    come back, and can you get down on Monday morning, to advise and
    endeavour to decide on the mechanical force we shall use for raising the
    water? I would return with you, as I shall have to be in town until
    Thursday, and then to go to Manchester until the following Tuesday.

    I send this by hand to John, to bring to you.

                                                      Ever affectionately.


    The second problem Dickens discovered with regard to Captain Goldsmith's dominating presence in the village was the location of the mail box. On March 29, 1859, he wrote -

    [Sidenote: Mr. Edmund Yates.]

                     TAVISTOCK HOUSE, TAVISTOCK SQUARE, LONDON, W.C.,
                                              _Tuesday, March 29th, 1859._

    MY DEAR EDMUND,

    1. I think that no one seeing the place can well doubt that my house at
    Gad's Hill is the place for the letter-box. The wall is accessible by
    all sorts and conditions of men, on the bold high road, and the house
    altogether is the great landmark of the whole neighbourhood. Captain
    Goldsmith's _house_ is up a lane considerably off the high road; but he
    has a garden _wall_ abutting on the road itself.

    Source: The Letters of Charles Dickens Vol. 2, 1857-1870
    THE LETTERS OF CHARLES DICKENS.
    EDITED BY HIS SISTER-IN-LAW AND HIS ELDEST DAUGHTER.
    =In Two Volumes.=
    VOL. II. 1857 TO 1870.        
    London:  CHAPMAN AND HALL, 193, PICCADILLY.  1880.
    CHARLES DICKENS AND EVANS, CRYSTAL PALACE PRESS.

    Captain Goldsmith's Will 
    Although a more detailed account will follow in future posts about this will and its stipulations concerning Captain Goldsmith's nieces, Mary Sophia Day, her sister Elizabeth Rachel Nevin nee Day and her husband, photographer Thomas J. Nevin, this page from the will gives some idea of the extent of Captain Edward' Goldsmith's holdings in the area of Chalk, Higham, Gravesend, Gad's Hill and Rochester in Kent, including his contractual arrangements on Dickens' house at Gad's Hill Place. Edward Goldsmith died in 1869, just one year before Charles Dickens.







    Pages 6.7. and 8 of Captain Edward Goldsmith's will, 1871
    (Ref: National Archives UK C16/781 C546012)

    Addenda
    Extracts from Dickens' biographer and contemporary John Forster (1812-1876)
    The Life of Charles Dickens (1872-1874)

    BOOK EIGHTH: PUBLIC READER (1856-67)
    III
    GADSHILL PLACE
    1856-1870

    "I was better pleased with Gadshill Place last Saturday," he wrote to me from Paris on the 13th of February 1856, "on going down there, even than I had prepared myself to be. The country, against every disadvantage of season, is beautiful; and the house is so old-fashioned, cheerful, and comfortable, that it is really pleasant to look at. The good old Rector now there, has lived in it six and twenty years, so I have not the heart to turn him out. He is to remain till Lady-Day next year, when I shall go in, please God; make my alterations; furnish the house; and keep it for myself that summer." Returning to England through the Kentish country with Mr. Wilkie Collins in July, other advantages occurred to him. "A railroad opened from Rochester to Maidstone, which connects Gadshill at once with the whole sea coast, is certainly an addition to the place, and an enhancement of its value. Bye and bye we shall have the London, Chatham and Dover, too; and that will bring it within an hour of Canterbury and an hour and a half of Dover. I am glad to hear of your having been in the neighbourhood. There is no healthier (marshes avoided), and none in my eyes more beautiful. One of these days I shall show you some places up the Medway with which you will be charmed."

    The association with his youthful fancy that first made the place attractive to him has been told; and it was with wonder he had heard one day, from his friend and fellow worker at Household Words, Mr. W. H. Wills, that not only was the house for sale to which he had so often looked wistfully, but that the lady chiefly interested as its owner had been long known and much esteemed by himself. Such curious chances led Dickens to the saying he so frequently repeated about the smallness of the world; but the close relation often found thus existing between things and persons far apart, suggests not so much the smallness of the world as the possible importance of the least things done in it, and is better explained by the grander teaching of Carlyle, that causes and effects, connecting every man and thing with every other, extend through all space and time.

    It was at the close of 1855 the negociation for its purchase began. "They wouldn't," he wrote (25 November), "take £1,700 for the Gadshill property, but 'finally' wanted £1,800. I have finally offered £1,750. It will require an expenditure of about £300 more before yielding £100 a year." The usual discovery of course awaited him that this first estimate would have to be increased threefold. "The changes absolutely necessary" (9 February, 1856) "will take a thousand pounds; which sum I am always resolving to squeeze out of this, grind out of that, and wring out of the other; this, that, and the other generally all three declining to come up to the scratch for the purpose.""This day," he wrote on 14 March, "I have paid the purchase-money for Gadshill Place. After drawing the cheque (£1,790) I turned round to give it to Wills, and said, 'Now isn't it an extraordinary thing -- look at the Day -- Friday! I have been nearly drawing it half a dozen times when the lawyers have not been ready, and here it comes round upon a Friday as a matter of course.'" He had no thought at this time of reserving the place wholly for himself, or of making it his own residence except at intervals of summer. He looked upon it as an investment only. "You will hardly know Gadshill again," he wrote in January 1858, "I am improving it so much -- yet I have no interest in the place." But continued ownership brought increased liking; he took more and more interest in his own improvements, which were just the kind of occasional occupation and resource his life most wanted in its next seven or eight years; and any farther idea of letting it he soon abandoned altogether. It only once passed out of his possession thus, for four months in 1859; in the following year, on the sale of Tavistock House, he transferred to it his books and pictures and choicer furniture; and thenceforward, varied only by houses taken from time to time for the London season, he made it his permanent family abode. Now and then, even during those years, he would talk of selling it; and on his final return from America, when he had sent the last of his sons out into the world, he really might have sold it if he could then have found a house in London suitable to him, and such as he could purchase. But in this he failed; secretly to his own satisfaction, as I believe; and thereupon, in that last autumn of his life, he projected and carried out his most costly addition to Gadshill. Already of course more money had been spent upon it than his first intention in buying it would have justified. He had so enlarged the accommodation, improved the grounds and offices, and added to the land, that, taking also into account this closing outlay, the reserved price placed upon the whole after his death more than quadrupled what he had given in 1856, for the house, shrubbery, and twenty years' lease of a meadow field. It was then purchased, and is now inhabited, by his eldest son.

    Its position has been described, and a history of Rochester published a hundred years ago quaintly mentions the principal interest of the locality. "Near the twenty-seventh stone from London is Gadshill, supposed to have been the scene of the robbery mentioned by Shakespeare in his play of Henry IV.; there being reason to think also that it was Sir John Falstaff, of truly comic memory, who under the name of Oldcastle inhabited Cooling Castle, of which the ruins are in the neighbourhood. A small distance to the left appears on an eminence the Hermitage, the seat of the late Sir Francis Head, Bart.; and close to the road, on a small ascent, is a neat building lately erected by Mr. Day. In descending Strood-hill is a fine prospect of Strood, Rochester, and Chatham, which three towns form a continued street extending above two miles in length." It has been supposed that "the neat building lately erected by Mr. Day" was that which the great novelist made famous; but Gadshill Place had no existence until eight years after the date of the history. The good rector who so long lived in it told me, in 1859, that it had been built eighty years before by a well-known character in those parts, one Stevens, grand-father-in-law of Henslow the Cambridge professor of botany. Stevens, who could only with much difficulty manage to write his name, had begun life as ostler at an inn; had become husband to the landlord's widow; then a brewer; and finally, as he subscribed himself on one occasion, "mare" of Rochester. Afterwards the house was inhabited by Mr. Lynn (from some of the members of whose family Dickens made his purchase); and, before the Rev. Mr. Hindle became its tenant, it was inhabited by a Macaroni parson named Townshend, whose horses the Prince Regent bought, throwing into the bargain a box of much desired cigars. Altogether the place had notable associations even apart from those which have connected it with the masterpieces of English humour. "THIS HOUSE, GADSHILL PLACE, stands on the summit of Shakespeare's Gadshill, ever memorable for its association with Sir John Falstaff in his noble fancy. But, my lads, my lads, to-morrow morning, by four o'clock, early at Gadshill! there are pilgrims going to Canterbury with rich offerings, and traders riding to London with fat purses: I have vizards for you all; you have horses for yourselves." Illuminated by Mr. Owen Jones, and placed in a frame on the first-floor landing, these words were the greeting of the new tenant to his visitors. It was his first act of ownership.

    All his improvements, it should perhaps be remarked, were not exclusively matters of choice; and to illustrate by his letters what befell at the beginning of his changes, will show what attended them to the close. His earliest difficulty was very grave. There was only one spring of water for gentlefolk and villagers, and from some of the houses or cottages it was two miles away. "We are still" (6 July) "boring for water here, at the rate of two pounds per day for wages. The men seem to like it very much, and to be perfectly comfortable." Another of his earliest experiences (5 September) was thus expressed: "Hop-picking is going on, and people sleep in the garden, and breathe in at the keyhole of the house door. I have been amazed, before this year, by the number of miserable lean wretches, hardly able to crawl, who go hop-picking. I find it is a superstition that the dust of the newly picked hop, falling freshly into the throat, is a cure for consumption. So the poor creatures drag themselves along the roads, and sleep under wet hedges, and get cured soon and finally." Towards the close of the same month (24 September) he wrote: "Here are six men perpetually going up and down the well (I know that somebody will be killed), in the course of fitting a pump: which is quite a railway terminus -- it is so iron and so big. The process is much more like putting Oxford-street endwise, and laying gas along it, than anything else. By the time it is finished, the cost of this water will be something absolutely frightful. But of course it proportionately increases the value of the property, and that's my only comfort. . . . The horse has gone lame from a sprain, the big dog has run a tenpenny nail into one of his hind feet, the bolts have all flown out of the basket-carriage, and the gardener says all the fruit trees want replacing with new ones." Another note came in three days. "I have discovered that the seven miles between Maidstone and Rochester is one of the most beautiful walks in England. Five men have been looking attentively at the pump for a week, and (I should hope) may begin to fit it in the course of October." . . . .

    With even such varying fortune he effected other changes. The exterior remained to the last much as it was when he used as a boy to see it first; a plain, old-fashioned, two-story, brick-built country house, with a bell-turret on the roof, and over the front door a quaint neat wooden porch with pillars and seats. But, among his additions and alterations, was a new drawing-room built out from the smaller existing one, both being thrown together ultimately; two good bedrooms built on a third-floor at the back; and such re-arrangement of the ground floor as, besides its handsome drawing-room, and its dining-room which he hung with pictures, transformed its bedroom into a study which he lined with books and sometimes wrote in, and changed its breakfast-parlour into a retreat fitted up for smokers into which he put a small billiard-table. These several rooms opened from a hall having in it a series of Hogarth prints, until, after the artist's death, Stanfield's noble scenes were placed there, when the Hogarths were moved to his bedroom; and in this hall, during his last absence in America, a parquet floor was laid down. Nor did he omit such changes as might increase the comfort of his servants. He built entirely new offices and stables, and replaced a very old coach-house by a capital servants' hall, transforming the loft above into a commodious school-room or study for his boys. He made at the same time an excellent croquet-ground out of a waste piece of orchard.

    Belonging to the house, but unfortunately placed on the other side of the high road, was a shrubbery, well wooded though in desolate condition, in which stood two magnificent cedars; and having obtained, in 1859, the consent of the local authorities for the necessary underground work, Dickens constructed a passage beneath the road from his front lawn; and in the shrubbery thus rendered accessible, and which he then laid out very prettily, he placed afterwards a Swiss chalet presented to him by Mr. Fechter, which arrived from Paris in ninety-four pieces fitting like the joints of a puzzle, but which proved to be somewhat costly in setting on its legs by means of a foundation of brickwork. "It will really be a very pretty thing," he wrote (January 1865), "and in the summer (supposing it not to be blown away in the spring), the upper room will make a charming study. It is much higher than we supposed." Once up, it did really become a great resource in the summer months, and much of Dickens's work was done there. "I have put five mirrors in the chalet where I write," 0 he told an American friend, "and they reflect and refract, in all kinds of ways, the leaves that are quivering at the windows, and the great fields of waving corn, and the sail-dotted river. My room is up among the branches of the trees; and the birds and the butterflies fly in and out, and the green branches shoot in at the open windows, and the lights and shadows of the clouds come and go with the rest of the company. The scent of the flowers, and indeed of everything that is growing for miles and miles, is most delicious." He used to make great boast, too, not only of his crowds of singing birds all day, but of his nightingales at night.

    One or two more extracts from letters having reference to these changes may show something of the interest to him with which Gadshill thus grew under his hands. A sun-dial on his back-lawn had a bit of historic interest about it. "One of the balustrades of the destroyed old Rochester Bridge," he wrote to his daughter in June 1859, "has been (very nicely) presented to me by the contractors for the workss, and has been duly stone-masoned and set up on the lawn behind the house. I have ordered a sun-dial for the top of it, and it will be a very good object indeed.""When you come down here next month," he wrote to me, "we have an idea that we shall show you rather a net house. What terrific adventures have been in action; how many overladen vans were knocked up at Gravesend, and had to be dragged out of Chalk-turnpike in the dead of the night by the whole equine power of this establishment; shall be revealed at another time." That was in the autumn of 1860, when, on the sale of his London house, its contents were transferred to his country home. "I shall have an alteration or two to show you at Gadshill that greatly improve the little property; and when I get the workmen out this time, I think I'll leave off." October 1861 had now come, when the new bedrooms were built; but in the same month of 1863 he announced his transformation of the old coach-house. "I shall have a small new improvement to show you at Gads, which I think you will accept as the crowning ingenuity of the inimitable." But of course it was not over yet. "My small work and planting," he wrote in the spring of 1866, "really, truly, and positively the last, are nearly at an end in these regions, and the result will await summer inspection." No, nor even yet. He afterwards obtained, by exchange of some land with the trustees of Watts's Charity, the much coveted meadow at the back of the house of which heretofore he had the lease only; and he was then able to plant a number of young limes and chesnuts and other quick-growing trees. He had already planted a row of limes in front. He had no idea, he would say, of planting only for the benefit of posterity, but would put into the ground what he might himself enjoy the sight and shade of. He put them in two or three clumps in the meadow, and in a belt all round.

    Still there were "more last words," for the limit was only to be set by his last year of life. On abandoning his notion, after the American readings, of exchanging Gadshill for London, a new staircase was put up from the hall; a parquet floor laid on the first landing; and a conservatory built, opening into both drawing-room and dining-room, "glass and iron," as he described it, "brilliant but expensive, with foundations as of an ancient Roman work of horrible solidity." This last addition had long been an object of desire with him; though he would hardly even now have given himself the indulgence but for the golden shower from America. He saw it first in a completed state on the Sunday before his death, when his younger daughter was on a visit to him. "Well, Katey," he said to her, "now you see positively the last improvement at Gadshill"; and every one laughed at the joke against himself. The success of the new conservatory was unquestionable. It was the remark of all around him that he was certainly, from this last of his improvements, drawing more enjoyment than from any of its predecessors, when the scene for ever closed.



    Victoria & Albert Museum
    Charles Dickens House Gadshill
    Date: 1850s to 1870s (photographed)
    Artist/Maker: Francis Frith, born 1822 - died 1898 (maker)
    Materials and Techniques: Whole-plate albumen print from wet collodion glass negative
    Credit Line: Acquired from F. Frith and Company, 1954
    Museum number: E.208:1513-1994


    RELATED ARTICLES main weblog


    Nevin Street and the Cascades Prison for Males 1875

    $
    0
    0


    Constable W. John Nevin , younger brother of photographer Thomas J. Nevin, was stationed at the Cascades Gaol for for Males, South Hobart from April 1875 to February 1877. He was then transferred to the Hobart Gaol, Campbell St. and remained in service on salary in administration as gaol messenger and photographer until his death from typhoid fever in 1891, aged 39 yrs. His length of service with H. M. Prisons was sixteen years.



    Signature of W. J. Nevin 1875-1877



    W.J. Nevin Applications to join the Constabulary Tasmania 1877 and 1881
    Records Courtesy State Library of Tasmania


    While a constable at the Cascade Gaol for Males, Constable Nevin was involved in an incident which was reported in The Mercury, 27 October 1875:



    Constable Nevin, Mercury, 27 October 1875.

    TRANSCRIPT

    CITY POLICE COURT
    Tuesday 26th October, 1875
    Before Mr. Tarleton, Police Magistrate
    PEACE DISTURBERS. - Robert Evans and William Inman were charged by Constable Pearce, of the Cascades, with having disturbed the peace in Upper Macquarie-street on the 24th inst. The defendants pleaded "not guilty". Constables Pearce and Nevin, of the Cascades, proved that the defendants were throwing stones and making a disturbance. The Police Magistrate said that in Upper Macquarie-street there existed the roughest of lads in Hobart Town. He would sentence both defendants to 14 days' imprisonment, and warn them that on proof of a second they would probably be birched.



    Constable John (W. J.) Nevin ca. 1880.
    Photo taken by his brother Thomas Nevin
    Copyright © KLW NFC & The Nevin Family Collections 2009 ARR. Watermarked.

    Adjacent to the Cascades Gaol for Males in the 1870s and leading directly up the hill behind it was a wide track, now a "No Through Road" named "Nevin Street". On the left, ascending the hill going northwest, and located at an address now called 2 Nevin Street, was a cemetery associated with the prison from its days as a Female Factory - a prison for females (1850s) - to its last uses as an invalid depot, orphanage, prison and reformatory (1870s onwards). Thereafter, the deceased were moved to the Cornelian Bay Cemetery.  Surrounding parcels of land were sold to a milkman by the Government in 1908. Constable Nevin was on duty at the Cascades on 11th May 1876 when the Government buried Trucanini there, considered in her time as one of the last Tasmanian Aborigines.

    The cemetery site itself at 2 Nevin St is vacant, however, marked as heritage interest. This report was compiled by the Tasmanian Heritage Council on 27 November 2007:

    The location of the graveyard is shown on two historical plans. A c.1859 plan of the Female Factory Reserve shows the graveyard to the northwest of Yard 5 as a roughly triangular shaped parcel of ground (AOT, PWD 266/382). An 1884 survey locates a morgue building on what was later to become Syme Street. It also locates nine graves orientated east-west, along the eastern boundary of the graveyard (LO, Hobart 65, 90469). Private residential development from the mid- to-late twentieth century occupies most of the place today. The housing is not considered to be of State heritage significance. Described in The Mercury in 1873 as ‘a pretty little green patch of three-quarters of an acre…. and has no denominational subdivision. Prisoners, paupers and juvenile offenders, of all creeds, find a resting place in the same spot, and a few graves are marked with neat little crosses erected by the friends or relations of those buried there’.

    The track or road was formally named Nevin Street at a date yet to be confirmed (at Lands and Titles Office?). The track leading to it was used by walking clubs extensively. In 1935, this map was issued by the Hobart Walkers' Club, which shows a road in heavy outline  leading up from the prison, leading northwest up McRobies Gully.



    Title: Mt. Wellington Park map of roads, tracks, etc. / [compiled by] V. W. Hodgman
    Creator: Hobart Walking Club (Tas.)
    Map data: Scale unknown
    Publisher: 1935
    Description: 1 map ; 17 1/2 inches in diameter (part col.), rolled
    Format: Map
    ADRI: AUTAS001131821340
    Source: Tasmaniana Library

    When Constable John Nevin renewed his contract and term of service in 1881 with H. M. Prisons Department, he was still living at home with his parents in the house built by his father on the property at Kangaroo Valley, which was situated on land adjacent to the Franklin Museum and the Wesleyan Chapel and school house where his father John Nevin taught children by day and adult males by night. He would have travelled by a different route to the Hobart Gaol in Campbell St, eventually taking up residence there. He was active in assisting his brother in photographic sessions both at the Gaol and adjoining Supreme Court. His employment was listed as salaried in administration and resident at the Campbell St Gaol on the electoral roll of 1884, and listed again as "gaol messenger" in residence when he died suddenly of typhoid fever in 1891.



    Signature of Wm. John Nevin, Kangaroo Valley, 24th November 1881.



    Surveyor's Map showing Hobart Gaol 1887 (TAHO)

    Constable John Nevin's brother, Thomas Nevin, took many photographs on the tracks leading from Kangaroo Valley across to the waterfall, Brushy Creek, the reservoir waterworks, and Hobart rivulet, mostly produced as commercial stereographs, sometimes attributed to Samuel Clifford, and currently in cold storage at the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. These photographs (below) were taken around the same years as Constable John Nevin's second attestation, 1881, to service at the Campbell Street Gaol. They are from the TAHO State Library of Tasmania, and unattributed.



    Title: Photograph - Group on walking track in bush setting
    Description: 1 photographic print
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: NS1013-1-808
    Source: Archives Office of Tasmania
    Series: Photographs and Glass Plate Negatives Collected by E R Pretyman, 1870 - 1930 (NS1013)



    Cascades Prison for Males
    TAHO Ref: NS1013145 (n.s. n.d.) This photo shows the track that is Nevin St rising up to the right



    Cascades Prison for Males
    TAHO Ref: NS1013146 . This photo was taken from Nevin St. Beattie print, no date.



    Cascades Prison for Males
    TAHO Ref: NS1013148 (n.s. n.d.)

    Nevin Street, South Hobart



    Detail of Hobart Walkers Map 1935 showing relative positions of the Nevin farm next to the Lady Franklin Museum and the two possible routes taken across country by Constable Nevin to the Cascades Gaol for Males in 1875.

    The 1935 Hobart Walkers Club map (detail above) shows two very distinct routes to the southeast which John Nevin might have chosen in the 1870s on his journey from the family farm at Kangaroo Valley, situated next to the Lady Franklin Museum where Thomas and John's father John Nevin snr had built their cottage. Whether on foot or horseback, the first and longer route he could have taken was along Kangaroo Valley road, alternatively titled Lenah Valley Road by 1922, to the waterhole and the cabin named by the Old Hobartians (alumni of Hobart High School) as their own by 1935.  He would then veer south on the path to the New Town Falls, crossing Brushy Creek until arriving at the edge of a very steep ravine . Once there, he would join the McRobies track until arriving at the Hobart Rivulet,  passing below the Cascades Brewery. The track, much wider at that point, passed by the cemetery, and ended directly opposite the Cascades Prison. Alternatively, he could have proceeded from the Museum along Brushy creek road a short way, then crossed onto a track which joined Pottery Road running bedside the creek, and joining another track until he reached the Slides. Descending a steep hill side on another short track adjacent to another creek led him onto the McRobies gully track which widened into a roadway, ending adjacent to the wall of the Cascades Gaol.  It therefore seems likely that the present Nevin Street was originally the track leading up McRobies Gully and the path Constable John Nevin used when coming and going to and from work at the Cascades Prison for Males from August 1875 to February 1877. Whether the street was named after Constable John Nevin's family is yet to be determined. Although Hobart fine arts dealer William Nevin Hurst maintains a connection to both the family of photographer Thomas Nevin and to the naming of Nevin St, the former claim is erroneous and the latter claim unconfirmed.




    No Through Road. Looking up Nevin St. 
    The vacant block on left in bottom left photo is the site of the cemetery at 2 Nevin St.
    Photos © copyright KLW NFC Imprint 2011 ARR




    Top: Looking northwest towards Nevin St from the prison wall
    Bottom: Looking southeast in the opposite direction towards Cascades Road
    Photos © copyright KLW NFC Imprint 2011 ARR

    RELATED POSTS main weblog

    Constable John Nevin at Trucanini's funeral 1876

    $
    0
    0
    Constable John Nevin (1852-1891), brother of photographer Thomas J. Nevin, was stationed at the Cascades Gaol and Reformatory from August 1875 until transferred to the Hobart Gaol. He was on duty at the burial of Trucanini, regarded then as the "last Tasmanian Aboriginal", on 10th-11th May 1876 at the Cascades cemetery. Located on a patch of ground -"a vacant spot opposite the Cascades" as the press described it (South Australian Register 12 May 1876) - that patch is now identified as No. 2, Nevin Street (Tasmanian Heritage Council 2007).



    Constable W. John (Jack) Nevin ca 1874-6
    Photographed by his brother Thomas J. Nevin
    Copyright © KLW NFC and The Private Collection of Denis Shelverton 2006 ARR.

    Trucanini died on  8th May, 1876, aged 73 years. Her body was guarded by a constable at the city hospital "to prevent any mutilation or snatching" until just after 11pm on Wednesday evening, 10th May 1876 when she was secretly removed from the hospital and transported personally to the Cascades by the Superintendent of the Cascades Gaol and Reformatory, the much reviled former Commandant of the Port Arthur prison, A. H. Boyd. He had suddenly appeared at the hospital and demanded her body be handed over to him, much to the surprise of staff on duty and the undertaker next day who arrived and left with an empty coffin. During the long night of Wednesday May 10th and the morning of Thursday May 11th until the time of her burial at midday, Trucanini's body, now at rest in the Cascades Chapel, was guarded by Constable John Nevin. The Sergeant-at-Arms, Mr. Calder, did not arrive till the proceedings were over.



    Above: Trucanini (alternate spelling Truganini) is seated here in this reproduction on glass by Anson's Photographs ca. 1880 of an original photograph attributed to C. A. Woolley taken in 1866. The verso below bears Anson's  label and the handwritten inscription "Last Aborigines of Tasmania": Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint, The Private Collection of John and Robin McCullagh 2007 ARR.



    Detail of portrait: Trucanini's hands



    The verso of this portrait bears (John) Anson's  label and the handwritten inscription "Last Aborigines of Tasmania": Copyright all photos © KLW NFC Imprint, The Private Collection of John and Robin McCullagh 2007 ARR

    Public Outrage at Government deception
    The public expected a funeral procession would take place at noon, and that a hearse carrying Trucanini's body would proceed from the hospital where a crowd waited, not knowing they had been deceived. This angry report appeared in the Mercury the following day, 12th May (full transcript below), and another which attempted an explanation, on the 13th May 1876.



    FULL TRANSCRIPT
    FUNERAL OF QUEEN TRUCANINI. (1876, May 12). The Mercury
    The remains of the last of the original inhabitants of Tasmania were yesterday consigned to their final resting-place, without any of that ostentatious display which took place at the burial of King Billy. Whatever difference of opinion there may be on the point whether there ought to have been any pageantry on so important an occasion, there can be no doubt that the Government, in their ostensible desire to interdict any such scandal as that which stirred up public indignation in 1869, have laid themselves open to blame, and to a feeling on the part of the public that they were simply playing into the hands of the Royal Society, which body was so anxious to obtain possession of the remains. Let the facts speak for them- selves. Trucanini died early on Monday afternoon, and her body was at once removed to the hospital, a constable being specially told off to watch over it, and prevent any snatching or mutilation. There was, of course, considerable anxiety felt as to where the remains were to be deposited, and when the funeral was to take place ; but it was Wednesday night before the Press was made acquainted with the decision of the Government, and not till yesterday morning was the information conveyed to the public. It was then done in such a manner as clearly to show that an attempt was to be made to deceive the public. The note from the Colonial Secretary, which appeared in yesterday's issue, after stating that the Government had refused the body to the Royal Society, ran thus :—"The Government have given orders for the decent interment of the corpse ; but, to prevent a recurrence of the unseemly scenes which were enacted in March, 1869, it has been deemed expedient to inter the body at the Cascades, in the vacant spot immediately in front of the chapel. The funeral will take place at noon to-morrow." The inference drawn from such information,when it was well-known that the body was at the hospital, was that the funeral would take place from that institution at noon, and that there would be a hearse, with the usual procession of mourners ; for there were many citizens who, prompted by a desire to show respect to the deceased, would have followed her remains. Towards noon numerous inquiries were made at the hospital, and up to one o'clock people were standing at street corners on the route which it was thought the cortége would take, waiting to see it pass ; but the Government had taken as much pains as possible to deceive them. It appears that at 11 o'clock on Wednesday night, Mr. A. H. Boyd, Superintendent of the Cascades Gaol and Reformatory, went to the hospital, armed with an authority from the Government, and demanded the body of the deceased Queen. It was, of course, given up, though the officials were taken completely by surprise, and evidently had never dreamt that any such demand would have been made upon them at that unseemly hour. At all events, the body was placed in the cart, and in the dead of the night, when all good citizens had retired to rest, it was borne through the streets of the city up to the Cascades institution. In this way, by a stratagem for which there was not the least necessity, and which does no credit to the Government, was the public frustrated in their desire to see proper respect paid to the last member of a now extinct race. To show how secret this removal of the remains was, and the duplicity which it was considered necessary should be practised, no intimation of it was conveyed to the undertaker, Mr. Hamilton. He, therefore, acting on instructions received, went to the hospital yesterday morning with the coffin, and was as much surprised as anyone when he found what had taken place. There is no palliation for the conduct of the Government in this matter. The remains were sufficiently protected by the presence of a constable, and the deliberate deception practised upon the public in the way we have described merits the strongest condemnation.
    The funeral would have rejoiced the hearts of those who are strenuously advocating a reform in all matters pertaining to the burial of the dead. It was of the simplest character imaginable, entirely devoid of all that useless paraphernalia, all those expensive and showy trappings, which in these times are looked upon as emblems of sorrow and respect for the deceased. In the little Protestant chapel at the Cascades Reformatory, the body of "our native Queen" lay stiff and cold in the plainest of coffins ; no ornamentation of any kind, with the except of the usual silver plate, being upon it. The sombre black contrasted with the white shroud, which, when turned back, revealed the dusky features of her whose life was one romance. We have heard some doubts expressed as to whether the coffin really contained the remains of Trucanini—doubts quite excusable, remembering the mutilation of King Billy and the conduct of the Government on this occasion—but our readers may rest assured on that point. Previous to the lid being screwed down several spectators, our reporter among the rest, were shown the face of the deceased Queen, and one lady, of eccentric habits, and who assumes to herself a title as high as that of poor Trucanini, touched the face, as if to make "assurance doubly sure." All this time the bell in the reformatory yard was tolling, and as none of the inmates of the institution, a few of the officials and servants excepted, were to be seen in the spacious enclosure, a death-like silence pervaded the place. The coffin screwed down, the spectators assembled in the chapel. They did not number, including some children, more than twenty-five. Among those present was the Hon. A. Kennerley, Premier ; the Hon. G. Gilmore, Colonial Secretary ; the Ven. Archdeacon Davies, Rev. W. W. Spicer, Mr. J. W. Graves, Dr. Lewis, Mr. Whitcombe, Mr. Gravenor, Mr. A. H. Boyd, etc. The Rev. Canon Parsons read the beautiful burial service of the Church of England, commencing "I am the resurrection and the life," and after the Psalm and the Lesson, the coffin was carried out of the chapel and placed over a grave that had been dug just in front of the door, all present following and assembling round the grave. The coffin having been lowered, the officiating clergyman read those solemn words beginning "Man that is born of a woman," etc., and committed "our dear departed sister" to the grave in the sure and certain hope of the resurrection to eternal life. Before it was placed in the grave, Mr. Gravenor, of New Town, who mixed as much with the natives in years gone by as any one now living, touched the coffin and uttered some native word, very much like farewell. After the ceremony was over Mr. Graves threw a sprig of heliocrysum (Graves-eye) into the grave ; and when just about to leave, an officer came up with a pretty bunch of native flowers and berries, kindly sent by Mrs. Dandridge, with whom Trucanini lived for the long period of twenty years, and in whose house she died. The bunch was handed to Mr. Boyd, who passed it to Mr. Graves, and that gentleman deposited it on the coffin. The inscription on the coffin was simply : "Trucanini. Died 8th May, 1876. Aged 73 years." There is no doubt that the number of spectators would have been much larger had the arrangements been thoroughly understood. The invitation of the Government to "any friends and sympathisers" reads now like a huge joke, and, under the circumstances, might well have been omitted. Among those who were specially anxious to be present was Mr. Calder, the Sergeant-at Arms, but he did not arrive till the proceedings were over. We may mention, to satisfy some doubts, that Trucanini was baptised at Oyster Cove by Bishop Nixon. We understand that a monument of some kind is to be erected over the grave, and Mr. Graves has been requested to write an epitaph for it. He has willingly undertaken the task, and proposes that it shall be inscribed in both the English and native languages.

    Source: FUNERAL OF QUEEN TRUCANINI. (1876, May 12). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 2. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article8944992

    READ THE ARTICLE of 12 May 1876  here [pdf]
    READ THE ARTICLE of 13 May 1876  here [pdf]

    The Memorial
    Exactly 100 years after her burial, Trucanini was cremated. Her ashes were scattered in the D'Entrecasteaux Channel off the Neck beach, and a memorial was erected  in Truganini Park, Mt Nelson, on 8th May, 1976.



    Source: ABC Radio National "Hindsight". Truganini, bushranger 12/4/2012
    http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/hindsight/truganini-bushranger/3178510
    http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/hindsight/truganini-memorial/3178630

    RELATED POSTS

    Prisoner Thomas GRIFFIN

    $
    0
    0


    NLA Catalogue (incorrect information)
    Title Thomas Griffin, per Rodney 2, taken at Port Arthur, 1874 [picture] (incorrect information)
    Date1874.(incorrect information)
    Extent1 photograph on carte-de-visite mount : albumen ; 9.4 x 5.6 cm. on mount 10.5 x 6.3 cm.

    POLICE RECORDS




    Thomas Griffin per Rodney 2 was discharged from the Port Arthur prison on 22-26 June 1872,  with a ticket of leave. He was not photographed at Port Arthur, despite the inscription on the verso of his photograph - if the NLA Catalogue notes have been literally transcribed, that is, which is often not the case with these photographs of prisoners bearing the 20th century archivist's incorrect information, errors further compounded by the NLA's batch edit of all 84 of their collection with the same date and place - "Port Arthur" and "1874" . Griffin's TOL was recorded earlier, on the 12 June 1872. His crime, committed in Tasmania, was housebreaking. He remained in service at the Military Barracks (Anglesea Barracks, Hobart) until he absconded on 6th January 1873. When he was found and arrested at Glenorchy by both the Hobart Police and Territorial Police, he was incarcerated at the Hobart Gaol where Thomas Nevin photographed him at trial in the week of 10 June 1873. The photograph shows clearly Griffin’s blind left eye.



    Griffin TOL 12 June 1872



    Thomas Griffin absconded 10 January 1873



    Thomas Griffin was arrested and photographed by Nevin at the Hobart Gaol, 10 June 1873. From then on, Thomas Griffin was in and out of prison on a regular basis until at least 1885 for crimes such as larceny, idle and disorderly, indecency and unlawfully on premises.



    Thomas Griffin discharged 14 June 1882



    Thomas Griffin discharge 22 August 1883



    Thomas Griffin discharged 30 July 1885



    Thomas Griffin was discharged 28 November 1885. Another photograph was taken of him on discharge by Thomas Nevin's brother, Constable John Nevin at the Hobart Gaol.

    Prisoner Charles GARFITT and the QVMAG

    $
    0
    0


    A photograph and carte-de-visite of Charles Garfitt, taken and printed by Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol in February 1873, was among the 200 or so prisoner identification photographs donated to the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery from John Watt Beattie's estate in 1930. Although some of these prisoner photographs arrived at the QVMAG still attached to the prisoner's criminal record sheet, the QVMAG has not digitised any of the complete records to which these photographs were attached, nor even acknowledged holding them, despite clear statements by the researchers Geoff Stilwell and John Mcphee of their existence when preparing the 1977 exhibition of these carte-de-visite vignettes by Thomas J. Nevin, all sourced from the Beattie Collection.



    Letter to Specialist Collections Geoff Stilwell at the State Library of Tasmania from the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery curator John McPhee, dated 24th February 1977.

    TRANSCRIPT

    Dear Geoffrey,
    Enclosed is a photostat of a convict history sheet, featuring a photograph. I think we have a couple of these.
    Should you be interested in including them in your exhibition or any of our T.J. Nevin photographs, do let me know.

    Best wishes,
    John

    [24.ii.1977]



    Wall chart or poster of Tasmanian convicts produced by the Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority with photographs taken of "Supreme Court men" by Thomas J. Nevin held at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery Beattie Collection. KLW NFC Imprint ARR.

    Charles Garfitt's photograph was reproduced in duplicate by Nevin from his original negative taken at the Supreme Court sittings and Oyer sessions , per government regulations (up to 25 were required in NSW). This one may be a loose duplicate, but it is unlikely to ever have existed without being pasted to Garfitt's prison record, whether in a regional police office, or at the Hobart Gaol and the Office of Police, Hobart Town Hall. It was removed and transcribed with "Port Arthur" and "1874" in order to attract tourists to the Port Arthur site itself in the 1890s, and to John Watt Beattie's convictaria museum in Hobart in particular in the early 1900s. Once acquired by the QVMAG in 1930, this cdv and the 200 or so like it held in the Beattie Collection were handled further and transcribed with more numbers verso and recto, many even copied: in 1934 for an exhibition of Beattie's work in Launceston; in 1958 for storage; in 1977 for the Nevin exhibition; in 1982 for the PAHSMA poster; in 1985 for the National Library of Australia's exhibition; in 1987 for the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, Hobart, who requested originals and copies, and again in 1995 for the TMAG publication of Tasmanian Photographers 1840-1940; and finally for digitisation post 2000. Many of these dates and archivist's numbers are visible on both recto and verso. Oddly, those museum and library workers still alive today will not come forward with an honest account of their involvement; to do so might eradicate the flim-flam arising in the 1980s as a "belief" (!) about  the corrupt Commandant of Port Arthur, non-photographer A. H. Boyd being the "author" of these mugshots (Chris Long, Warwick Reeder), reaching hysterical heights in 2007 as pure nasty politics at the NLA (Julia Clark, Margy Burn), that has only magnified the charismatic hold Thomas Nevin's mugshots of Tasmanian prisoners can have on simple minds. After all, his work was greatly admired by Beattie, in the first instance, and that is why these mugshots have survived today from the 1870s.



    Prisoner Charles Garfitt, photograph by T. Nevin February 1873
    Source: QVMAG Ref: 1985 p0111



    Prisoner Charles Garfitt, verso of photograph by T. Nevin 1873
    Taken at the Supreme Court Hobart, 18 February 1873 and not at Port Arthur 1874 (see above)
    Source: QVMAG Ref: 1985 p0111

    Police Records



    Charles Garfitt and Thomas Griffin, report of January 10th, 1873. This police gazette notice states that Garfitt stole property from Samuel Butterworth but it was recovered by the Hobart Territorial Police.



    Charles Garfitt per M.S. Elphinstone was arrested for larceny and convicted on 23 January 1873, two weeks later tried at the Supreme Court Hobart.



    Charles Garfitt was tried at the Supreme Court, Hobart for housebreaking, sentenced to 8 yrs on 18 February 1873. He was photographed by Nevin on imprisonment at the Hobart Gaol in that week.



    Charles Garfitt was discharged from the Hobart Gaol on 28 August 1878. Two years later he was tried again at the Supreme Court Hobart for breaking and entering a dwelling.



    Charles Garfitt was discharged from the Hobart Gaol on 12 December 1885, having been tried again and convicted at the Supreme Court Hobart on 14 December 1880 for breaking and entering.

    Michael Gilmore was also discharged on 12 December 1885. Two different photographs of a prisoner called Michael Gilmore were taken by Nevin, but not of the same man. See this article.




    RELATED POSTS main weblog

    Prisoner Michael GILMORE and the NLA

    $
    0
    0
    Michael Gilmore was a career criminal, or so it seems His convictions included burglary, larceny, indecency, idle and disorderly, feloniously wounding etc. He was in and out of prison on a regular basis from 1869. In October 1874 Thomas Nevin photographed him at the Hobart Gaol. These records include his convictions and discharges from 1874 to 1885. His aliases were Terence or Michael Moore.



    NLA Catalogue (incorrect information)
    nla.pic-vn4269935 PIC P1029/17a LOC Album 935 Micheal Gilmore, per Prince Regent, taken at Port Arthur, 1874 [picture] 1874. 1 photograph on carte-de-visite mount : albumen ; 9.4 x 5.6 cm. on mount 10.5 x 6.3 cm.


    POLICE RECORDS



    Michael Gilmore absconded 9 October 1874



    Michael Gilmore alias Terence Moore was arrested and photographed by Thomas J. Nevin on 15 October 1874 at the Hobart Gaol.



    Gilmore discharged 4 June 1879



    Gilmore discharged 12 November 1879



    Gilmore discharged 28 May 1880



    Gilmore arraigned 17 June 1880



    Gilmore discharged 17 December 1884



    Gilmore discharged 9 July 1885



    Gilmore discharged 9 December 1885

    The other Micheal [sic] Gilmore
    A second carte is held at the NLA of a different man, with the name spelt as Micheal Gilmore. Thomas Nevin photographed two men called Michael Gilmore, but not the same man.



    NLA Catalogue (incorrect information)
    nla.pic-vn4269951
    Micheal Gilmore, per Prince Regent, taken at Port Arthur, 1874 [2] [picture]
    1874. 1 photograph on carte-de-visite mount : albumen ; 9.4 x 5.6 cm. on mount 10.5 x 6.3 cm.

    Addenda and Update
    The information about Gilmore's criminal activities from the police gazettes, called Tasmania Reports of Crime Information for Police, James Barnard, Gov't Printer, is easily obtainable, so why was nothing but basic transportation records about this prisoner, Michael Gilmore (and the second man with a similar name) included in the National Library of Australia's publication of their Tasmanian "convict portraits", titled Exiled, The Port Arthur Convict Photographs (NLA 2011)?



    Above: The two convicts called Gilmore, printed here on page 206 of Exiled (2011). Basic information from the transportation records, nothing more, just the photographs.
    Below: frontispiece, with the misleading sub-title.
    Photos copyright © KLW NFC 2012 ARR



    The reason is simply this: the NLA rushed into print with this book to regain copyright of their collection of "Port Arthur convicts" which currently numbers 84 photographs, seemingly under threat of a digital audience using weblogs such as this one. Sadly, the authors of Exiled had no interest or expertise in examining the PHOTOGRAPHS themselves as artefacts, despite the sub-title of the book. Furthermore, their attribution to Thomas J. Nevin as the photographer was compromised - not surprisingly - with Port Arthur tourism propaganda and fallacies about the non-photographer A.H. Boyd by the author's historical advisor, Hamish Maxwell-Stewart, as required by the masters who feather his nest with hefty grants and the students who worship at his feet. Tropes and whole chunks of text were plagiarised by Barnard and Stewart from these weblogs, and whatever information we chose not to display online, those gaps also appear as lacunae in the publication Exiled, yet no request for permission was received to liberally use our weblogs for their commercial purpose. The evidence is indicative here, for example, regarding this prisoner Gilmore. The information about Michael Gilmore which we had not published to accompany his photograph by 2011- but publish now in 2014 - is also missing from Exiled (see page 206 above)With all that government assistance entails, in terms of NLA staff, hours, funding, and glossy publishing, plus free research assistance provided by Maxwell-Stewart's students at the University of Tasmania, one could reasonably expect a better product and better practice from the National Library of Australia. Instead, they have politicised this particular collection of "convict portraits", and defamed those who question their ethics.

    RELATED POSTS

    Captain Edward Goldsmith at the Royal Society Gardens

    $
    0
    0


    Hops and Sarsparilla
    http://www.panteek.com/ZornIcones/pages/zor541-463.htm
    http://www.panteek.com/Turpin1814/pages/tur280-341.htm

    At his own expense ...
    Master mariner and merchant trader Captain Edward Goldsmith (1804-1869) was a contemporary of Sir John Franklin who founded in 1839 the society which became in 1848 the first Royal Society for the advancement of science outside Britain. In the early years the Society met under the name The Van Diemen's Land Horticultural Society at Lady Jane Franklin's Museum which she had built on 400 acres of land acquired from Dr Hull at Kangaroo Valley (Tasmania) and named Ancanthe. By 1848, Captain Goldsmith had imported a wide variety of plants - many at his own expense - to provide the Royal Society's Botanic gardens on the Queen's Domain above his patent slip yard with the finest specimens from English nurseries. The Royal Society moved to permanent quarters at the Royal Museum in 1862, now the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery.

    Captain Edward Goldsmith's connection with Lady Jane Franklin extended into the next generation when his niece Elizabeth Rachel Day married photographer Thomas J. Nevin at the Wesleyan Chapel, Kangaroo Valley in 1871, on land held in tenure to Thomas' father John Nevin snr, who built his cottage there and tended his orchards adjacent to the Lady Franklin Museum from the 1850s to his death in 1887.

    IMPORTS by Captain Goldsmith



    Captain Goldsmith's importations, The Courier 17 November 1847
    Source; LOCAL. (1847, November 17). The Courier (Hobart, Tas. : 1840 - 1859), p. 2. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article2970481

    TRANSCRIPT

    IMPORTATIONS.-We learnt that Captain Goldsmith has brought out in the Rattler, and landed in prime condition, for W. A. Bethune, Esq., a number of pure Merino rams and ewes, as a change of blood in this colony, and for the improvement of the fleece in fine wools. He has also succeeded in bringing into port in a flourishing and healthy state several varieties of new strawberries for T. Horne, Esq.; new kinds of hops for Mr. Sharland; several cases of flowering shrubs and plants for Mr. Newman, of the Royal Botanical Gardens, another for E. P. Butler, Esq., and one, also, for Mr. F. Lipscombe. At his own expense Captain Goldsmith has imported upwards of one hundred varieties of plants and shrubs of the most approved sorts in the English nurseries; and, in accordance with his considerate attention on former visits to our port, has on this occasion not been unmindful of a desire to introduce to the colony additional objects of attention. Of these are white swans, so attractive in the sheets of water in park scenery; and pheasants and partridges, likely to become prolific in the bush of this colony, which is deemed well adapted to their nature and habits: so that, eventually, the " Old English Gentlemen" may once more enjoy their favourite sports, and the native youth become practically acquainted with the game which abounds in the rich domains of England. Examples of this kind are worthy of imitation by captains of colonial traders.
    Note that it was a desire of the "Old English Gentlemen" - and not as yet one come to fruition - to import swans, pheasants, partridge and other game for their own hunting pleasure, in the hope the local lads might emulate their English tastes. The report ended with unmitigated flattery of Captain Goldsmith's philanthropy as an example to other captains of colonial traders. His generosity and goodwill, however, were stretched to limits by 1855 when the Colonial Secretary offered to re-imburse Captain Goldsmith just £5000 for costs to build the ferry Kangaroo while his own outlay exceeded £6000 "without any charge for his own time, interest of money, use of yard etc". The real costs to him personally, he claimed, were higher than £9400.



    Print: Jardin botanique D’Hobart Town (Ile Van Diemen) / dessine par L. Le Breton Lithe par P. Blanchard
    Publisher: Paris : Gide, [184-?]
    ADRI: AUTAS001125294538
    Source: W.L. Crowther Library



    Frederick Lipscombe (1808-1887) nurseryman,
    ADRI: AUTAS001136191079
    Source: Allport Library and Museum of Fine Arts


    One year later, Captain Goldsmith imported flowers and herbs and some strawberry plants for nurseryman Mr Frederick Lipscombe which perished on the journey.


    Captain Goldsmith's imports on the Rattler, the Courier 13 December 1848
    Source: LOCAL. (1848, December 13). The Courier (Hobart, Tas. : 1840 - 1859), p. 2. Retrieved February 15, 2014, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article2967335

    IMPORTED PLANTS.- The medal awarded to the Rev. R. R. Davies, of Longford, was mentioned in the Courier. We have been favoured with a list of the plants, &c. which the rev. gentleman has imported; we publish it, with a view to prevent a contingency that often happens - the importation of duplicates, when new specimens only are wanting. Amongst them are the following, which are new: - Magnolias purpurea and soulangeana ; azaleas Phœnicia, coccinea, and calendalocea ; hibiscus variegata and Syracus alba ; nerium versicolor, alba plena, alba plenex, lutescens, and cardinalis ; rosa aimee, Vibert's aimee, Jeanne desprez, Rivers musk, rutifolia, and six other varieties of which the labels are lost; rhododendron pygmœae and dauricum, (there are also two other varieties, but it is doubtful whether they can be saved;) the true snowberry and dog's-tooth violet; viburnum, hairy-leuved, opulifolia, and variegated myrtles. Besides these, he has imported magnolia grandi- flora, annoniflora, and gracilis ; azalea indica alba and pur- purea ; hibiscus rosa sinensis, flava, plena, and peduncu- latus; nerium purpurescens, grandiflora, alto-purpurea, and lacteum ; rosa unique, alba odorata, oduralissima, microphylla, and perdita ; Banksia lutea ; rhododendron ponticum, arboretum,and feruginnea; bougainvillia specta- bilis; syringa or mock orange, and other varieties ; lily of the valley; althauturtea; viburnum Japonicum and sinense; Portugal laurel, glycine sinensis, variegated holly and ferox, with about fifty varieties of double camellias ; and a box of plants from the Cape of Good Hope, containing some new mesembryanthemums and aloes, two plants like the richea of this country, and two others not named, with rosa Banksia alba, another new sort.The flora of this country has also received a great addition by the importation of some plants for Mr. F. Lipscombe in the Rattler,Captain Goldsmith. The following are in good condition :-Lilium rubrum, schimenes picta, campanula novilis, gloxinia rubra, Rollisonii, speciosa alba, and Pressleyans ; anemone japónica, lilium puctata, torenia concolor, lobelia erinus compacta, myasola (a "forget-me not"), and another new specimen of the same; cuphan mineara, weigella roses, phlox speciosa, cuphea pletycentra, lantana Drummondii and Sellowii, phloz rubra, achimines Hendersonii ; with the following camellias - Queen Victoria,- elegans, tricolor, triumphans, speciosa, Palmer's perfection, and Reevesii. These were all contained, with others, in one case ; they were well established in pots before packing, which has tended to their preservation. Another case contains lemon thyme, sage, and the Mammoth and Elisabeth strawberries. The same course in this instance had not been pursued; the plants were put into mould at the bottom of the case, and in almost every instance have perished. A quantity of carnations unfortunately experienced the same fate. Importers will therefore do well to impress upon their agents in England the necessity of establishing them in pots before packing. In the exportation of Van Diemen's Land shrubs to the United Kingdom, India, and Mauritius, Mr. Lipscombe always adopts this method, and it is of rare occurrence for any specimen to be lost.
    The saga of the lost Mammoth and Elizabeth strawberry plants on this trip was dragged through the press by Mr Lipscombe in order to embarrass Captain Goldsmith, even into 1853, the year of the Jubilee. See this article here on this site.



    Title: Royal Society's Gardens, & Government House / Clifford photo
    Creator: Clifford, Samuel, 1827-1890
    In: Abbott album Item 54
    Publisher: 1868
    Description: 1 photograph : sepia toned ; 10 x 17 cm
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: AUTAS001136189081
    Source: W.L. Crowther Library

    EXPORTS by Captain Goldsmith
    Even as the potato famine in Ireland was taking hold , Captain Goldsmith offered to export varieties of seed potatos which had proved successful in experiments, in the hope that a change of seed and further experimentation in the "kingdom" amongst his friends might assist. Again, his offer to pay for the transport and experiments in England from his private account was noted. Some Tasmanian varieties exported were the "black Derwent" and the "fine ash-leaved kidney". Captain Goldsmith also exported Tasmanian timbers. He exhibited a blue gum plank at the Paris Expo in 1855.



    Captain Goldsmith's export of Tasmanian potatos
    The Courier 30 January 1847
    Source:LOCAL. (1847, January 30). The Courier (Hobart, Tas. : 1840 - 1859), p. 2. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article2972781

    SEED POTATOS FOR ENGLAND.-We noticed recently the importance that would be derived by the Home-country,could the potato disease be eradicated by a change of seed. At the same time, we did not express any sanguine opinion, founded on experiments that had been already tried, of the success of any extensive exportations from this colony. Experiments, however, are about to be tried-not, it is true, on a large scale, by merchants in the way of business, but by the philanthropic efforts of private individuals. We have heard within the last few days, of several samples of very fine and ripe seed potatos-including especially the black Derwent and the fine ash-leaved kidney-being already on their way to England in the vessels that have recently left our shores, freighted with colonial produce. Captain Goldsmith, of the Rattler, took with him, not as merchandise, but on his own private account, as presents for experiment by his agricultural friends in England, samples of several varieties. Many samples are now being packed for transmission in the Derwent and other vessels, whose departure may shortly be expected. These also are comparatively small; but as they will be dispersed as presents to friends in different parts of the kingdom, the experiment of success in eradicating the disease, by change of seed from this colony, will have, perhaps, a fairer and more satisfactory trial than if exportation had taken place on a larger scale on merchants' account.



    Title: Royal Society's Gardens, & Government House / A.A. photo
    Creator: Abbott, Alfred, 1838-1872
    In: Abbott album Item 56 and 67
    Publisher: 1861
    Description: 1 stereoscopic pair of photographs : sepia toned ; circular, 8 cm. diam. each
    Description: 1 stereoscopic pair of photographs : sepia toned ; 8 x 7 cm. each
    Format: Photographs
    ADRI: AUTAS001136189214
    ADRI: AUTAS001136189107
    Source: W.L. Crowther Library


    For more newspaper reports about Captain Edward Goldsmith, check this tag list at TROVE. Many deal with his importation of machinery on the Rattler to build a patent slip on the Queen's Domain, the troubles which ensued, and the enormous costs on his own account to build the steam ferry the Kangaroo for the Denison government in 1854. See related posts below, some of which also document his familial relations with Elizabeth his wife, his two sons, his brother-in-law, his two nieces and their husbands, and his neighbour at Gad's Hill, Kent - Charles Dickens.



    Captain Edward Goldsmith elected to the Royal Society




    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Van Diemen's Land
    Vol.II, Part I. January 1852 Tasmania
    Source: Smithsonian Institution Museum Library
    https://archive.org/stream/papersproceeding2185253roya/papersproceeding2185253roya_djvu.txt

    Election of Captain Goldsmith 1851



    17th December, 1851.— John Lillie, D.D., a Vice-President of
    the Society, in the chair.
    After a ballot, the following gentlemen were declared duly elected
    into the Society :— Captain Goldsmith, of Hobart Town, and
    Andrew Mowbray, M.D., of Circular Head.


    Title: Royal Society's Museum / Clifford photo
    Creator: Clifford, Samuel, 1827-1890, photographer
    In Abbott album Item 42
    Publisher: 1862
    Description: 1 photograph : sepia toned ; 70 x 76 mm
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: AUTAS001136188968
    Source: W.L. Crowther Library

    Captain Goldsmith's specimen of gold



    Captain Goldsmith presented a fine specimen of gold upon an indurated
    ferruginous clay, brought by himself from Central America, where it was
    obtained at an elevation of about 3000 feet, in 13° North.

    Fellows etc 1852



    FELLOWS,& CORRESPONDING MEMBERS,
    AND HONORARY MEMBERS.
    *Denotes Members admitted since the close of 1851.

    Gardner, W. A
    Garrett, Rev. James
    Garrett, Robert
    Giblin, Thomas
    Gibson, James
    Gill, W. H
    Gleadow, J. W., M.L.C
    Goldsmith, Captain
    Gould, John, F.R.S.,* &c
    Grant, James
    Grant, James
    Greenwood, Joseph, Capt. 31st Regiment,
    Major Brigade
    Gregson, T. G., M.L.C
    Gregson, John Compton
    Gresley, Nigel, Union Bank
    Grey, Sir George, K.C.B., Governor-in-Chief
    Groom, Francis
    Gunn, Ronald C, F.L.S
    Gunn, William

    Contributions 1852



    LIST OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY'S
    GARDENS DURING 1852.

    January — 1 case, 29 plants, per " Rattler," presented by Captain Goldsmith.
    „ 1 case, 32 plants, per " Emma," from Botanic Gardens, Sydney.
    „ 1 case, 31 plants, per " Rattler," from London, presented by the
    Venerable Archdeacon Davies.
    February — 1 case, 16 plants, per " Emma," from Camden, Sydney.
    April — 1 case, 300 plants, pines, from Norfolk Island.
    June — 2 cases, 40 plants, from China, presented by A. MacNaughtan, Esq.
    „ 1 box of seeds, 120 species, from Cape of Good Hope, presented by
    Alexander MacNaughtan, Esq.
    „ 1 case, 50 varieties bulbs, from Cape of Good Hope, presented by
    His Excellency Sir W. T. Denison.
    „ 1 case, 400 pines, from Norfolk Island.
    ,, 1 case, 34 species bulbs, from Cape of Good Hope, presented by His
    Excellency Sir W. T. Denison.
    July — 1 case, 50 plants from New Zealand, presented by H. S. Chapman, Esq.
    November— 1 case, 40 plants, from Knight and Perry, Chelsea.
    December — 1 case, 40 plants, per " Desilles," from Bourbon, forwarded
    from the Botanic Gardens there.

    Contributors 1852



    CONTRIBUTORS TO THE MUSEUM DURING 1852.
    Abbott, John.
    Addison, S., Capt.
    Aitkin, Marcus, A.P,M.
    Allport, Mrs.
    Allport, Morton.
    Anstey, H. F., M.L.C.
    Archer, Wm., M.L.C.
    Becker, Ludwig, M.D.
    Berthon, Benjamin.
    Browne, Thomas.
    Burnett, J. L.
    Butterworth, C. B., Hon. Colonel.
    Cartwright, Henry Durance.
    Champ, W. T. N.
    Cotton, Major.
    Cotton, Henry.
    Crowther, W. L.
    Denison, His Excellency Sir Wo T,
    Dixon, Capt.
    Eardley- Wilmot, Chester.
    Eraser, Peter.
    Gardiner, Arthur.
    Glover, John, junr., Sorell.
    Goldsmith, Captain.Gresley, Edward.
    Groom, Francis.
    Hawkes, W. K.
    Hone, Joseph.
    Hull, George.
    Hull, Hugh.
    Johnson, John.
    Jones, A. B.
    Kenworthy, Dr.
    Lillie, Rev. Dr.
    Loch, J. D.
    Maclaine, H.
    MacNaughtan, A.
    Milligan, Joseph.
    Moore, Wm.
    Moses, Samuel.
    Moses, Alfred.
    Newman, F. W.
    Officer, Robert.
    Propsting, Richard.
    Robertson, Rev. J.
    Rolwegan, George.
    Stieglitz, Francis.
    Storey, G.
    Walker, G. W.
    Westcott, W.
    Wheeler, J. A., A.P.M.
    Young, Wm. Portland.
    Young, J. M.

    Valuable Plants per the Rattler



    Captain Goldsmith presented to the Society's Gardens a case of valuable plants (28), imported per Rattler. A case containing 31 plants received from A. McLeay. Esq., of Sydney. From the Botanic Gardens at Sydney, a case received containing 32 species, partly exotics.

    Thomas Dobson on hurricanes



    An able paper on the relation between earthquakes, volcanic action, and hurricanes, designed as a pendant to the paper produced on the same subject last month, was read by Thomas Dobson, Esq., of the High School. Discussions on earthquakes and volcanoes followed, in which Mr. Mitchell and others took part. Mr. Hort stated that the earthquake of 1848, in New Zealand, was accompanied night after night with a most brilliant display of auroral lights, and that a season of excessively stormy weather succeeded. Captain Goldsmith's long experience on the Coast of America did not allow him, he said, to conclude that volcanic eruptions are usually or necessarily accompanied with, or followed by, high winds and stormy weather.
    The thanks of the meeting to the persons making donations, and for the papers read, proposed by Mr. Hathaway and seconded by Mr. Hopkins, were voted. Mr. Hort drew attention to the great interest so constantly manifested by Sir William Denison in the welfare of this Society and the promotion of its objects ; and, instancing the communications between His Excellency and the Governor-General read to night, moved that a vote of thanks be passed to His Excellency, which, being seconded by Captain Goldsmith, was earned unanimously, and the meeting broke up about half-past nine.
    Strawberry Plants to Norfolk Island



    DISTRIBUTION OF PLANTS, SEEDS, &c., FROM THE
    SOCIETY'S GARDENS TO PERSONS AND PLACES ABROAD
    DURING 1852.
    January — 1 case, 51 plants, per " Tasman," to Knight and Perry, Chelsea.
    „ 1 case, 41 Araucarias, to Messrs. Lane, London,
    ,, 1 case, 72 Araucarias, per " Wellington," to Messrs. Lee,
    Hammersmith.
    „ 1 ease, 51 Araucarias, per " Wellington," to Messrs. Lee, of
    Hammersmith.
    „ 1 case, 42 Araucarias, per " Rattler," to Lucombe and Price,
    Exeter.
    February — 2 cases, 600 strawberry plants, to Norfolk Island.
    „ 1 case, 28 plants, per " Rattler," to London, in exchange with Captain Goldsmith. June— 1 case, 29 plants, per " Middleton," to S. Kennard, Esq., London.
    ,, 1 case, 43 Araucarias, per "Middleton," to Messrs, Lee, Hammer-
    smith.
    „ 1 case, 29 plants, per " Middleton," to William Jackson, Esq.,
    London.
    „ 1 case, 400 Araucarias, per " Aurora," to Botanic Gardens, Sydney.

    Books purchased during 1852



    LIST OF BOOKS PURCHASED DURING 1852.
    Gould's Birds of Europe, folio, 5 vols.
    Gould's Humming Birds, folio. Part I.
    Horticultural Magazine.
    Paxton's Flower Garden.
    Journal of Agriculture and Transactions of the Highland and Agricultural
    Society of Scotland.
    Annals of Natural History.
    Hooker's Journal of Botany.
    Beck's Florist.
    Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal.
    Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London.
    United States Exploring Expedition. Wilkes. 1 vol., large 8vo.
    Report of British Association, 1850.
    Pickering's Races of Men, 1 vol.
    Supplement to Penny Cyclopsedia, 2 vols.
    Lindley's Introduction to Botany, 2 vols., Svo.
    Victoria Regia, plates, imp. folio.
    Grant's Outlines of Comparative Anatomy.
    Brewster on Magnetism.
    Dennis's Silk Manual.
    Franklin Expedition, by Scoresby.
    Conchologia Iconica. Reeves. Parts 1 to 108.
    Hooker's " Rhododendrons of the Himalaya." Parts 1 & 2.
    Hooker's Flora of New Zealand. Part 1.



    Title: Museum / [photographed by Anson Brothers, Hobart]
    In: Photographs of Hobart and surroundings, Huon Valley and east towards Port Arthur Pl. [16]
    Publisher: Hobart [Tas.] : Anson, ca. 1878
    Description: 1 photograph : sepia toned ; 105 X 180 mm
    Format: Photograph
    ADRI: AUTAS001136156536
    Source: W.L. Crowther Library

    RELATED POSTS main weblog
    Viewing all 263 articles
    Browse latest View live